Literature DB >> 28378073

Kinematics of cervical segments C5/C6 in axial rotation before and after total disc arthroplasty.

Martin Michael Wachowski1,2, Jan Weiland3, Markus Wagner4, Riccardo Gezzi3, Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg3, Hans Nägerl3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The kinematical properties of C5/C6 segments in axial rotation are evaluated before and after total disc arthroplasty (TDA) with PRESTIGE®-and BRYAN® Cervical Disc (Medtronic) under flexion/extension as parameters and compared with those of C3/C4.
METHODS: Eight human segments were stimulated by triangularly varying, axially directed torque (T z(t)) under compressing static axial preloads. Using a 6D-measuring device with high resolution, the response of segmental motion was characterized by the instantaneous helical axis (IHA). The position, direction, and migration path length of the IHA were measured before and after TDA (parameter: position of the axially directed preload).
RESULTS: The periodic torque T z(t) generated IHA migrations whereupon the IHA direction was constantly rotated to the dorsal by ≈15.5°. After TDA, the IHA0 (neutral positions) were significantly shifted to the dorsal (PRESTIGE®: 4.3 mm, BRYAN®: 7.0 mm) just as the points of balance of the entire IHA migration paths.
CONCLUSIONS: Due to the configuration of the vertebral joints and their interaction with the intervertebral disc, the IHA migrates during the axial rotation within a distinct domain of each C5/C6-segment. Implantation of the PRESTIGE® and BRYAN® prostheses significantly alters these kinematical properties by dorsal displacements of the domains. Statistically TDA of C3/C4 and of C5/C6 are not correlated. Under axial rotation of the cervical spine, additional lateral and/or ventral/dorsal displacements are produced by TDA. Consequently, adjacent level disease (ALD) may be mechanically stimulated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Bryan; IHA; Kinematics; Prestige; Spine; Total disc arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28378073     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5073-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  19 in total

1.  Instant axis of rotation of L4-5 motion segment--a biomechanical study on cadaver lumbar spine.

Authors:  Dilip K Sengupta; Constantine K Demetropoulos; Harry N Herkowitz
Journal:  J Indian Med Assoc       Date:  2011-06

2.  Knee motion analysis of the non-loaded and loaded knee: a re-look at rolling and sliding.

Authors:  H Nagerl; J Walters; K H Frosch; C Dumont; D Kubein-Meesenburg; J Fanghanel; M M Wachowski
Journal:  J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.011

3.  [Cervical disc prostheses].

Authors:  E W Fritsch; T Pitzen
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.

Authors:  Sang Ki Chung; Young Eun Kim; Kyu-Chang Wang
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 5.  Comparison of biomechanical properties of cervical artificial disc prosthesis: a review.

Authors:  Ronald H M A Bartels; Roland D Donk; Paul Pavlov; Jacques van Limbeek
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 1.876

6.  In vitro 3D-kinematics of the upper cervical spine: helical axis and simulation for axial rotation and flexion extension.

Authors:  Pierre-Michel Dugailly; Stéphane Sobczak; Victor Sholukha; Serge Van Sint Jan; Patrick Salvia; Véronique Feipel; Marcel Rooze
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-09-12       Impact factor: 1.246

7.  Migration of the instantaneous axis of motion during axial rotation in lumbar segments and role of the zygapophysial joints.

Authors:  Martin Michael Wachowski; Thelonius Hawellek; Jan Hubert; Andrea Lehmann; Michael Mansour; Clemens Dumont; Jochen Dörner; Björn Werner Raab; Dietmar Kubein-Meesenburg; Hans Nägerl
Journal:  Acta Bioeng Biomech       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.073

8.  Clinical and radiologic comparison of dynamic cervical implant arthroplasty and cervical total disc replacement for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Liu Shichang; Song Yueming; Liu Limin; Wang Lei; Zhou Zhongjie; Zhou Chunguang; Yang Xi
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  [Biomechanical principles in diarthroses and synarthroses. IV: the mechanics of lumbar vertebrae. A pilot study].

Authors:  H Nägerl; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Cotta; J Fanghänel; A Rossow; S Spiering
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec

10.  How do spinal segments move?

Authors:  M M Wachowski; M Mansour; C Lee; A Ackenhausen; S Spiering; J Fanghänel; C Dumont; D Kubein-Meesenburg; H Nägerl
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.712

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spondylolisthesis adjacent to a cervical disc arthroplasty does not increase the risk of adjacent level degeneration.

Authors:  David Christopher Kieser; Derek Thomas Cawley; Cecile Roscop; Simon Mazas; Pierre Coudert; Louis Boissiere; Ibrahim Obeid; Jean-Marc Vital; Vincent Pointillart; Olivier Gille
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-31       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The impact of bilateral facetectomy on the instantaneous helical axis of the functional thoracic spinal unit T4-5 during axial rotation.

Authors:  Paul Jonathan Roch; Dominik Saul; Nikolai Wüstefeld; Stefan Spiering; Wolfgang Lehmann; Lukas Weiser; Martin Michael Wachowski
Journal:  Int Biomech       Date:  2021-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.