Literature DB >> 15834512

Lateral vertebral assessment: a valuable technique to detect clinically significant vertebral fractures.

Neil Binkley1, D Krueger, R Gangnon, H K Genant, M K Drezner.   

Abstract

Although many vertebral fractures are clinically silent, they are associated with increased risk for subsequent osteoporotic fractures. A substantial number of these fractures are demonstrable using instant vertebral assessment with Hologic densitometers. Whether similar recognition is possible using dual-energy lateral vertebral assessment (LVA) with GE Lunar densitometers remains uncertain. Thus, we evaluated the ability of clinicians using LVA to detect prevalent vertebral fractures. Dual-energy LVA and conventional thoracic and lumbar spine radiographs were concurrently obtained in 80 postmenopausal women. Using an established visual semiquantitative system, vertebral fractures were identified individually by two non-radiologist clinicians on LVA images, and the results were compared with spinal radiograph evaluation by an expert radiologist. Using LVA, 95% of vertebral bodies from T7 through L4 were evaluable, but a majority (66%) of vertebrae from T4 to T6 were not adequately visualized. In the LVA-evaluable vertebrae, prevalent fractures were identified in 40 vertebral bodies by radiography. In this regard, the clinicians using LVA detected 17 of 18 radiographically evident vertebral fractures of grade 2 or 3, a false negative rate of 6%. They identified 50% (11/22) of grade 1 fractures. Additionally, the vast majority of evaluable non-fractured vertebrae, (764/794, 96.2%) were correctly classified as normal by LVA. Thus, clinicians utilizing LVA correctly identified the vast majority of grade 2 or 3 vertebral compression fractures and normal vertebral bodies, although detection of grade 1 fractures was less effective. In conclusion, the low-radiation, dual-energy LVA technique provides a rapid and convenient way for clinicians to identify patients with, and without, grade 2 or 3 vertebral fractures, thereby enhancing care of osteoporotic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15834512     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-1891-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  30 in total

1.  Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity.

Authors:  J A Rea; J Li; G M Blake; P Steiger; H K Genant; I Fogelman
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Spine deformity index (SDI) versus other objective procedures of vertebral fracture identification in patients with osteoporosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  P Sauer; G Leidig; H W Minne; G Duckeck; W Schwarz; L Siromachkostov; R Ziegler
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 6.741

3.  Epidemiology of vertebral fractures in women.

Authors:  L J Melton; S H Kan; M A Frye; H W Wahner; W M O'Fallon; B L Riggs
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting.

Authors:  S H Gehlbach; C Bigelow; M Heimisdottir; S May; M Walker; J R Kirkwood
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Severity of prevalent vertebral fractures and the risk of subsequent vertebral and nonvertebral fractures: results from the MORE trial.

Authors:  P D Delmas; H K Genant; G G Crans; J L Stock; M Wong; E Siris; J D Adachi
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.398

6.  No secular increase in the prevalence of vertebral fractures due to postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  M A Hansen; K Overgaard; V A Nielsen; G F Jensen; A Gotfredsen; C Christiansen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Ability of vertebral dimensions from a single radiograph to identify fractures.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  H K Genant; M Jergas; L Palermo; M Nevitt; R S Valentin; D Black; S R Cummings
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 9.  Vertebral fractures in osteoporosis: a new method for clinical assessment.

Authors:  H K Genant; J Li; C Y Wu; J A Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Instant vertebral assessment: a noninvasive dual X-ray absorptiometry technique to avoid misclassification and clinical mismanagement of osteoporosis.

Authors:  S L Greenspan; E von Stetten; S K Emond; L Jones; R A Parker
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  43 in total

1.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: executive summary of recommendations.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Efficacy of the dynamic radiographs for diagnosing acute osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  R Niimi; T Kono; A Nishihara; M Hasegawa; A Matsumine; T Kono; A Sudo
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Detection of vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Elliott N Schwartz; Dee Steinberg
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists Medical Guidelines for Clinical Practice for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Authors:  Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.443

5.  Prediction models of prevalent radiographic vertebral fractures among older men.

Authors:  John T Schousboe; Harold R Rosen; Tamara J Vokes; Jane A Cauley; Steven R Cummings; Michael C Nevitt; Dennis M Black; Eric S Orwoll; Deborah M Kado; Kristine E Ensrud
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Simplified criteria for selecting patients for vertebral fracture assessment.

Authors:  Sharon H Chou; Tamara J Vokes; Siu-Ling Ma; Maureen Costello; Harold R Rosen; John T Schousboe
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 7.  Use of DXA-based technology for detection and assessment of risk of vertebral fracture in rheumatology practice.

Authors:  Michael Maricic
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.592

8.  Influence of non-traumatic thoracic and lumbar vertebral fractures on sagittal spine alignment assessed by radiation-free spinometry.

Authors:  M Krause; S Breer; B Mohrmann; E Vettorazzi; R P Marshall; M Amling; F Barvencik
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Risk factors for prevalent vertebral fractures in black and white female densitometry patients.

Authors:  Tamara J Vokes; Daniel L Gillen; Ann T Pham; Jeanne M Lovett
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 2.617

10.  How useful is dual energy lateral vertebral assessment in a clinic setting?

Authors:  Bernadette McGuinness; Sandra Stewart; Hugh Taggart
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2009-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.