Literature DB >> 16172512

Examining the developing bone: What do we measure and how do we do it?

M A Petit1, T J Beck, S A Kontulainen.   

Abstract

The clinical tools available to evaluate bone development in children are often ambiguous, and difficult to interpret. Unfortunately bone densitometry methods (i.e., dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, DXA) which have a relatively straightforward application in adult osteoporosis, are far more difficult to evaluate in the growing skeleton. Even with adequate "adjustment" for bone size or maturity, bone "density" (areal or volumetric) alone often gives an inaccurate assessment of bone strength--especially in children. Ideally, we would like to measure both material and geometric properties of bone to accurately estimate "strength". Mechanically meaningful measures of bone geometry (bone cross-sectional area, cortical thickness) and estimates of bending strength (section modulus, or SSI) are available with non-invasive techniques such as (p)QCT and some DXA software. With new technology it might be possible to also measure bone material properties, which will be especially important in some pediatric disorders. In children, we also need to know something about the loads imposed on a child's bone and consider not only absolute bone strength, but also the strength of bone relative to the physiologic loads. Interpreting bone strength in light of the loads imposed (particularly muscle force) is critical for an accurate diagnosis of the developing bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16172512

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact        ISSN: 1108-7161            Impact factor:   2.041


  30 in total

1.  Comparisons of trabecular and cortical bone in late adolescent black and white females.

Authors:  Norman K Pollock; Emma M Laing; Ruth G Taylor; Clifton A Baile; Mark W Hamrick; Daniel B Hall; Richard D Lewis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Bone and fat relationships in postadolescent black females: a pQCT study.

Authors:  N K Pollock; E M Laing; M W Hamrick; C A Baile; D B Hall; R D Lewis
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Black bear femoral geometry and cortical porosity are not adversely affected by ageing despite annual periods of disuse (hibernation).

Authors:  Meghan E McGee; Danielle L Miller; Janene Auger; Hal L Black; Seth W Donahue
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Bone geometry, density, and strength indices of the distal radius reflect loading via childhood gymnastic activity.

Authors:  Jodi N Dowthwaite; Portia P E Flowers; Joseph A Spadaro; Tamara A Scerpella
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 2.617

5.  Bone strength and muscle properties in postmenopausal women with and without a recent distal radius fracture.

Authors:  K Crockett; C M Arnold; J P Farthing; P D Chilibeck; J D Johnston; B Bath; A D G Baxter-Jones; S A Kontulainen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Hip bone strength indices in overweight and control adolescent boys.

Authors:  Zaher El Hage; Denis Theunynck; Christophe Jacob; Elie Moussa; Rafic Baddoura; Pierre Kamlé; Rawad El Hage
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 2.626

7.  Geometric indices of hip bone strength in obese, overweight, and normal-weight adolescent boys.

Authors:  R El Hage
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Are milk and alternatives and fruit and vegetable intakes during adolescence associated with cortical and trabecular bone structure, density, and strength in adulthood?

Authors:  E Z Movassagh; S Kontulainen; A D G Baxter-Jones; S Whiting; M Szafron; M Papadimitropoulos; H Vatanparast
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Histone deacetylase 3 depletion in osteo/chondroprogenitor cells decreases bone density and increases marrow fat.

Authors:  David F Razidlo; Tiffany J Whitney; Michelle E Casper; Meghan E McGee-Lawrence; Bridget A Stensgard; Xiaodong Li; Frank J Secreto; Sarah K Knutson; Scott W Hiebert; Jennifer J Westendorf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Physical activity and femoral neck bone strength during childhood: the Iowa Bone Development Study.

Authors:  Kathleen F Janz; Julie M Eichenberger Gilmore; Steven M Levy; Elena M Letuchy; Trudy L Burns; Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 4.398

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.