Literature DB >> 16169955

A computational study of the aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight.

Ji Kang Wang1, Mao Sun.   

Abstract

The aerodynamics and forewing-hindwing interaction of a model dragonfly in forward flight are studied, using the method of numerically solving the Navier-Stokes equations. Available morphological and stroke-kinematic parameters of dragonfly (Aeshna juncea) are used for the model dragonfly. Six advance ratios (J; ranging from 0 to 0.75) and, at each J, four forewing-hindwing phase angle differences (gamma(d); 180 degrees, 90 degrees, 60 degrees and 0 degree) are considered. The mean vertical force and thrust are made to balance the weight and body-drag, respectively, by adjusting the angles of attack of the wings, so that the flight could better approximate the real flight. At hovering and low J (J=0, 0.15), the model dragonfly uses separated flows or leading-edge vortices (LEV) on both the fore- and hindwing downstrokes; at medium J (J=0.30, 0.45), it uses the LEV on the forewing downstroke and attached flow on the hindwing downstroke; at high J (J=0.6, 0.75), it uses attached flows on both fore- and hindwing downstrokes. (The upstrokes are very lightly loaded and, in general, the flows are attached.) At a given J, at gamma(d)=180 degrees, there are two vertical force peaks in a cycle, one in the first half of the cycle, produced mainly by the hindwing downstroke, and the other in the second half of the cycle, produced mainly by the forewing downstroke; at gamma(d)=90 degrees, 60 degrees and 0 degree, the two force peaks merge into one peak. The vertical force is close to the resultant aerodynamic force [because the thrust (or body-drag) is much smaller than vertical force (or the weight)]. 55-65% of the vertical force is contributed by the drag of the wings. The forewing-hindwing interaction is detrimental to the vertical force (and resultant force) generation. At hovering, the interaction reduces the mean vertical force (and resultant force) by 8-15%, compared with that without interaction; as J increases, the reduction generally decreases (e.g. at J=0.6 and gamma(d)=90 degrees, it becomes 1.6%). A possible reason for the detrimental interaction is as follows: each of the wings produces a mean vertical force coefficient close to half that needed for weight support, and a downward flow is generated in producing the vertical force; thus, in general, a wing moves in the downwash-velocity field induced by the other wing, reducing its aerodynamic forces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16169955     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Photogrammetric reconstruction of high-resolution surface topographies and deformable wing kinematics of tethered locusts and free-flying hoverflies.

Authors:  Simon M Walker; Adrian L R Thomas; Graham K Taylor
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Improvement of the aerodynamic performance by wing flexibility and elytra--hind wing interaction of a beetle during forward flight.

Authors:  Tuyen Quang Le; Tien Van Truong; Soo Hyung Park; Tri Quang Truong; Jin Hwan Ko; Hoon Cheol Park; Doyoung Byun
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2013-06-05       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Flying in reverse: kinematics and aerodynamics of a dragonfly in backward free flight.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Samane Zeyghami; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  Aerodynamics, sensing and control of insect-scale flapping-wing flight.

Authors:  Wei Shyy; Chang-Kwon Kang; Pakpong Chirarattananon; Sridhar Ravi; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.704

5.  The reverse flight of a monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus) is characterized by a weight-supporting upstroke and postural changes.

Authors:  Ayodeji T Bode-Oke; Haibo Dong
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.118

6.  The evolution of two distinct strategies of moth flight.

Authors:  Brett R Aiello; Usama Bin Sikandar; Hajime Minoguchi; Burhanuddin Bhinderwala; Chris A Hamilton; Akito Y Kawahara; Simon Sponberg
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Aerodynamic characteristics of a feathered dinosaur measured using physical models. Effects of form on static stability and control effectiveness.

Authors:  Dennis Evangelista; Griselda Cardona; Eric Guenther-Gleason; Tony Huynh; Austin Kwong; Dylan Marks; Neil Ray; Adrian Tisbe; Kyle Tse; Mimi Koehl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Kinematics and Aerodynamics of Dragonflies (Pantala flavescens, Libellulidae) in Climbing Flight.

Authors:  Liansong Peng; Tianyu Pan; Mengzong Zheng; Shiying Song; Guanting Su; Qiushi Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-16

Review 9.  Flight of the dragonflies and damselflies.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Toshiyuki Nakata; Per Henningsson; Huai-Ti Lin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.