Literature DB >> 27624065

Adult Parasitoids of Honeydew-Producing Insects Prefer Honeydew Sugars to Cover their Energetic Needs.

Marijke Lenaerts1, Lamis Abid2, Caroline Paulussen1, Tim Goelen1, Felix Wäckers3,4, Hans Jacquemyn5, Bart Lievens6.   

Abstract

To meet their carbohydrate requirements, adult parasitoids exploit a broad range of sugar resources, including floral and extrafloral nectar and honeydew. Although honeydew might be the predominant sugar source, especially in agricultural systems, it often is nutritionally inferior to sugar sources like nectar. Given its broad availability, it may be expected that sugar-feeding insects have evolved specialized adaptations to deal with this typically inferior sugar source. This would apply especially to organisms that have a close association with honeydew producers. Here, we hypothesized that parasitoids of honeydew-producing insects should show a pronounced response to sugars, such as fructose, sucrose, melezitose, and trehalose, and to a lesser extent glucose. To test this hypothesis, we investigated sugar consumption, feeding behavior and survival of the aphid parasitoid Aphidius ervi on several sugars (equiweight solutions). Our results show that A. ervi adults consumed typical honeydew sugars (sucrose, fructose, trehalose, and melezitose) the most, while consuming considerably less glucose or melibiose. Rhamnose, which does not occur in aphid honeydew, was not, or was only marginally, consumed. When different sugars were provided at the same time, A. ervi adults preferred sucrose or fructose over glucose or melezitose. Furthermore, pre-exposure to sucrose or fructose significantly reduced subsequent intake of glucose, suggesting an acquired distaste for glucose after being previously exposed to highly preferred sugars such as sucrose and fructose. Altogether, this study shows that A. ervi adults prefer sugars (fructose, melezitose, trehalose, and sucrose) that are overrepresented in aphid honeydew and show a lower preference to one (glucose) that is underrepresented in honeydew.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aphidius ervi; Honeydew; Sugar consumption; Sugar feeding; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27624065     DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0764-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Ecol        ISSN: 0098-0331            Impact factor:   2.626


  11 in total

Review 1.  Parasitoid nutritional ecology in a community context: the importance of honeydew and implications for biological control.

Authors:  Alejandro Tena; Felix L Wäckers; George E Heimpel; Alberto Urbaneja; Apostolos Pekas
Journal:  Curr Opin Insect Sci       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.186

2.  Sugar convertibility in the parasitoid Cotesia glomerata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae).

Authors:  Claudia Hausmann; Felix L Wäckers; Silvia Dorn
Journal:  Arch Insect Biochem Physiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.698

3.  Physical, chemical, and enzymatic studies on the major sucrase of honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  R E Huber; R D Mathison
Journal:  Can J Biochem       Date:  1976-02

4.  A comparison of nectar- and honeydew sugars with respect to their utilization by the hymenopteran parasitoid Cotesia glomerata.

Authors:  F L. Wäckers
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.354

5.  Postsecretory hydrolysis of nectar sucrose and specialization in ant/plant mutualism.

Authors:  M Heil; J Rattke; W Boland
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-04-22       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The significance of gut sucrase activity for osmoregulation in the pea aphid, Acyrthosiphon pisum.

Authors:  A J Karley; D A Ashford; L M Minto; J Pritchard; A E Douglas
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Prandiology of Drosophila and the CAFE assay.

Authors:  William W Ja; Gil B Carvalho; Elizabeth M Mak; Noelle N de la Rosa; Annie Y Fang; Jonathan C Liong; Ted Brummel; Seymour Benzer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Different food sources affect the gustatory response of Anaphes iole, an egg parasitoid of Lygus Spp.

Authors:  J Peirce Beach; Livy Williams; Donald L Hendrix; Leslie D Price
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Nutritional ecology of a parasitic wasp: food source affects gustatory response, metabolic utilization, and survivorship.

Authors:  Livy Williams; Timberley M Roane
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 2.354

10.  Sugar feeding by the aphid parasitoid Binodoxys communis: how does honeydew compare with other sugar sources?

Authors:  Kris A G Wyckhuys; Jessica E Strange-George; Chris A Kulhanek; Felix L Wäckers; George E Heimpel
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 2.354

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sweet Scents: Nectar Specialist Yeasts Enhance Nectar Attraction of a Generalist Aphid Parasitoid Without Affecting Survival.

Authors:  Islam S Sobhy; Dieter Baets; Tim Goelen; Beatriz Herrera-Malaver; Lien Bosmans; Wim Van den Ende; Kevin J Verstrepen; Felix Wäckers; Hans Jacquemyn; Bart Lievens
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 5.753

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.