Literature DB >> 16162380

Frequency and determinants of advance directives concerning end-of-life care in The Netherlands.

Mette L Rurup1, Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen, Agnes van der Heide, Gerrit van der Wal, Dorly J H Deeg.   

Abstract

In the USA, the use of advance directives (ADs) has been studied extensively, in order to identify opportunities to increase their use. We investigated the prevalence of ADs and the factors associated with formulation of an AD in The Netherlands, using samples of three groups: the general population up to 60 years of age, the general population over 60 years of age, and the relatives of patients who died after euthanasia or assisted suicide. The associated factors were grouped into three components: predisposing factors (e.g. age, gender), enabling factors (e.g. education) and need factors (e.g. health-related factors). We found that living wills had been formulated by 3% of younger people, 10% of older people, and 23% of the relatives of a person who died after euthanasia or assisted suicide. Most living wills concerned a request for euthanasia. In all groups, 26-29% had authorized someone to make decisions if they were no longer able to do so themselves. Talking to a physician about medical end-of-life treatment occurred less frequently, only 2% of the younger people and 7% of the older people had done so. Most people were quite confident that the physician would respect their end-of-life wishes, but older people more so than younger people. In a multivariate analysis, many predisposing factors were associated with the formulation of an AD: women, older people, non-religious people, especially those who lived in an urbanized area, and people with less confidence that the physician would respect their end-of-life wishes were more likely to have formulated an AD. Furthermore, the enabling factor of a higher level of education, the need factor of contact with a medical specialist in the past 6 months, and the death of a marital partner were associated with the formulation of an AD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16162380     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  30 in total

1.  Advance directives: prevalence and attitudes of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy.

Authors:  Birgitt van Oorschot; Michael Schuler; Alfred Simon; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Did you seek assistance for writing your advance directive? A qualitative study.

Authors:  Matthias Becker; Birgit Jaspers; Claudius King; Lukas Radbruch; Raymond Voltz; Friedemann Nauck
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  Perspectives on Aging-Related Preparation.

Authors:  Silvia Sörensen; Rachel L Missell; Alexander Eustice-Corwin; Dorine A Otieno
Journal:  J Elder Policy       Date:  2021

4.  A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?

Authors:  K Ann McKibbon; Cynthia Lokker; Nancy L Wilczynski; Donna Ciliska; Maureen Dobbins; David A Davis; R Brian Haynes; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  Thinking about the end of life: a common issue for patients with Huntington's disease.

Authors:  Suzanne J Booij; Aad Tibben; Dick P Engberts; Johan Marinus; Raymund A C Roos
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Interpreting advance directives: ethical considerations of the interplay between personal and cultural identity.

Authors:  Silke Schicktanz
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2009-05-08

7.  Age-based disparities in end-of-life decisions in Belgium: a population-based death certificate survey.

Authors:  Kenneth Chambaere; Judith A C Rietjens; Tinne Smets; Johan Bilsen; Reginald Deschepper; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-06-18       Impact factor: 3.295

8.  Design of the Advance Directives Cohort: a study of end-of-life decision-making focusing on Advance Directives.

Authors:  Matthijs P S van Wijmen; Mette L Rurup; H Roeline W Pasman; Pam J Kaspers; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Culture and end of life care: a scoping exercise in seven European countries.

Authors:  Marjolein Gysels; Natalie Evans; Arantza Meñaca; Erin Andrew; Franco Toscani; Sylvia Finetti; H Roeline Pasman; Irene Higginson; Richard Harding; Robert Pool
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Costs and advance directives at the end of life: a case of the 'Coaching Older Adults and Carers to have their preferences Heard (COACH)' trial.

Authors:  Billingsley Kaambwa; Julie Ratcliffe; Sandra L Bradley; Stacey Masters; Owen Davies; Craig Whitehead; Catherine Milte; Ian D Cameron; Tracey Young; Jason Gordon; Maria Crotty
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 2.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.