Literature DB >> 16160757

Hospital rates of maternal and neonatal infection in a low-risk population.

Lisa M Korst1, Moshe Fridman, Philippe S Friedlich, Michael C Lu, Carolina Reyes, Calvin J Hobel, Gilberto F Chavez, Kimberly D Gregory.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ) published its Quality Indicators for healthcare, and set out methodological criteria for the evaluation of potential candidates.
OBJECTIVES: Because perinatal infections may result from poor obstetrical practices, we intended to describe the variability of maternal and congenital neonatal infections across different types of hospital ownership (e.g., not for profit, government), and to assess whether rates of these infections meet criteria as quality indicators. RESEARCH
DESIGN: Population-based cohort study.
SUBJECTS: All laboring women without maternal, fetal, or placental complications who delivered in California in 1997, and their neonates, as reported through hospital discharge data. MEASURES: A Bayesian hierarchical logistic regression model was used to quantify the effects of both "patient-level" risk factors such as parity and prior cesarean history, and "hospital-level" risk factors such as ownership and teaching status.
RESULTS: The 308,841 mother-newborn pairs in this low-risk study population delivered at 281 hospitals; 0.39% had uterine infections and 1.3% had neonatal infections. Hospital ownership and teaching status were strongly associated with perinatal infection. Secondly, methods used to estimate and analyze hospital-specific infection rates identified hospitals with exceptionally high rates. Twenty-eight hospitals had neonatal infection rates that ranged from 3% to 28%.
CONCLUSIONS: The methods presented here were consistent with AHRQ methods and criteria for potential Quality Indicators. They also identified hospitals with exceptionally high rates of infectious morbidity. The relationship between hospital ownership and obstetrical practice patterns, and the feasibility of practice improvement, remain to be studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16160757     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-005-0006-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  13 in total

1.  Risk adjusting cesarean delivery rates: a comparison of hospital profiles based on medical record and birth certificate data.

Authors:  D L DiGiuseppe; D C Aron; S M Payne; R J Snow; L Dierker; G E Rosenthal
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Variation in elective primary cesarean delivery by patient and hospital factors.

Authors:  K D Gregory; L M Korst; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Using ICD-9 codes to identify indications for primary and repeat cesarean sections: agreement with clinical records.

Authors:  O A Henry; K D Gregory; C J Hobel; L D Platt
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Effects of hospital policies based on 1996 group B streptococcal disease consensus guidelines. The Active Bacterial Core Surveillance Team.

Authors:  S H Factor; C G Whitney; S S Zywicki; A Schuchat
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 5.  Chorioamnionitis and endometritis.

Authors:  B M Casey; S M Cox
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.982

6.  Vital statistics linked birth/infant death and hospital discharge record linkage for epidemiological studies.

Authors:  B Herrchen; J B Gould; T S Nesbitt
Journal:  Comput Biomed Res       Date:  1997-08

7.  A population-based comparison of strategies to prevent early-onset group B streptococcal disease in neonates.

Authors:  Stephanie J Schrag; Elizabeth R Zell; Ruth Lynfield; Aaron Roome; Kathryn E Arnold; Allen S Craig; Lee H Harrison; Arthur Reingold; Karen Stefonek; Glenda Smith; Melanie Gamble; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Cesarean delivery rates and neonatal morbidity in a low-risk population.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Gould; Beate Danielsen; Lisa M Korst; Roderic Phibbs; Kathy Chance; Elliott Main; David D Wirtschafter; David K Stevenson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  The impact of nonclinical factors on repeat cesarean section.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1991-01-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevention of perinatal group B streptococcal disease. Revised guidelines from CDC.

Authors:  Stephanie Schrag; Rachel Gorwitz; Kristi Fultz-Butts; Anne Schuchat
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2002-08-16
View more
  2 in total

1.  Caesarean sections in teaching hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis of hospitals in 22 countries.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Esra Zhubi; Krenare Grezda; Blerta Kryeziu; Jeta Bunjaku; Fitim Sadiku; Riaz Agahi; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Manila Bonciani; George Little
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Association between day of delivery and obstetric outcomes: observational study.

Authors:  William L Palmer; A Bottle; P Aylin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-11-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.