Literature DB >> 16158534

Binaural-bimodal hearing: concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid.

Michal Luntz1, Talma Shpak, Hadas Weiss.   

Abstract

CONCLUSION: The benefit obtained with a contralateral hearing aid (HA) in unilateral cochlear implantees improves over time, at least during the first year after implantation.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate binaural-bimodal auditory ability and its early changes over time after unilateral cochlear implantation in patients with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear, in which they use an HA.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sentence identification in background noise was tested in 12 patients (3 post-lingual adults and 9 pre-lingual adults and older children) under 3 listening conditions: cochlear implant (CI) alone, HA alone and CI+HA. The presentation level was 55 dB HL with a signal-to-noise ratio of +10 dB. Subjects were tested after 1-6 months of concomitant use of both devices and again after a further 7-12 months.
RESULTS: At the first testing session, the mean score in background noise was 34.9% with CI alone (range 0-90%) and 41.1% with both devices (range 0-100%). Seven patients could recognize sentences in noise with CI alone, and four of them showed further improvement with added amplification. At the second session, at which all subjects could recognize sentences in noise with the CI alone, seven showed further improvement with added amplification. The mean score was 60.6% with CI alone (range 10-99%) and 75.5% with both devices (range 52-100%).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16158534     DOI: 10.1080/00016480510035395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  14 in total

1.  Speech recognition performance in children with cochlear implants using bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  S B Rathna Kumar; P Mohanty; S G R Prakash
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-01-05

Review 2.  Brain control and information transfer.

Authors:  Edward J Tehovnik; Lewis L Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Recent advances in hearing restoration.

Authors:  Kunal Kulkarni; Douglas Eh Hartley
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Comparison of bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant users on speech recognition with competing talker, music perception, affective prosody discrimination, and talker identification.

Authors:  Helen E Cullington; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Christina L Runge; Jamie Jensen; David R Friedland; Ruth Y Litovsky; Sergey Tarima
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

6.  [Discrimination of musical pitch with cochlear implants].

Authors:  S Haumann; R Mühler; M Ziese; H von Specht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Exploring the factors influencing discontinued hearing aid use in patients with unilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Stéphanie Leblanc
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-03-14

8.  Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.

Authors:  Camille C Dunn; Ann Perreau; Bruce Gantz; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.664

Review 9.  Binaural-bimodal fitting or bilateral implantation for managing severe to profound deafness: a review.

Authors:  T Y C Ching; E van Wanrooy; H Dillon
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-09

10.  Sentence Recognition in Quiet and Noise in School-Going Indian Children Using Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Aparna Nitin Nandurkar; Karthik Venugopal; Richa Arya
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-11-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.