Literature DB >> 31750193

Sentence Recognition in Quiet and Noise in School-Going Indian Children Using Bimodal Hearing.

Aparna Nitin Nandurkar1, Karthik Venugopal2, Richa Arya3.   

Abstract

To compare sentence recognition scores in quiet and noise in 8 to 15-years old children using bimodal hearing in CI only condition and bimodal condition (BM) (CI + HA). Twenty prelingually deafened participants (8-15 years) using cochlear implant in one ear and hearing aid in the other ear were recruited. The sentence recognition was assessed in CI Quiet, CI + 15 dB SNR, CI + 8 dB SNR, BM Quiet, BM + 15 dB SNR and BM + 8 dB SNR. The highest sentence recognition scores were obtained in the quiet condition, followed by the + 15 dB SNR and then by the + 8 dB SNR condition in both CI only and BM conditions. The sentence recognition scores obtained in BM condition were significantly better than CI only condition. Variables like unaided PTA and aided PTA correlated significantly with the sentence recognition scores in BM conditions. This study was done on Indian population where till date no published data is available. It recommends that all the school going children using unilateral cochlear implants should be recommended to use a hearing aid in the contra lateral ear. This practice will help them to receive all the binaural benefits, better listening in noise, localization, spatial release from masking and pitch perception in comparison to unilateral CI use. Moreover, it will help to keep the auditory nerve viable for future implantation which is an important implication for children who have limited benefit from the contra lateral hearing aid. © Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2018.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimodal hearing; Cochlear implants; Noise; Sentence recognition

Year:  2018        PMID: 31750193      PMCID: PMC6841995          DOI: 10.1007/s12070-018-1529-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2231-3796


  16 in total

1.  Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.

Authors:  Jafar Hamzavi; Stefan Marcel Pok; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Speech and melody recognition in binaurally combined acoustic and electric hearing.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ginger S Stickney; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Rene H Gifford; Anthony J Spahr; Sharon A McKarns
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-11-29       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  An overview of binaural advantages for children and adults who use binaural/bimodal hearing devices.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Paula Incerti; Mandy Hill; Emma van Wanrooy
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A K Nabelek; J M Pickett
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1974-12

6.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children.

Authors:  T Finitzo-Hieber; T W Tillman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1978-09

7.  Speech recognition and acoustic features in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Yang-soo Yoon; Yongxin Li; Qian-Jie Fu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization.

Authors:  Richard S Tyler; Aaron J Parkinson; Blake S Wilson; Shelley Witt; John P Preece; William Noble
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing).

Authors:  Lisa G Potts; Margaret W Skinner; Ruth A Litovsky; Michael J Strube; Francis Kuk
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.664

10.  Bimodal hearing benefit for speech recognition with competing voice in cochlear implant subject with normal hearing in contralateral ear.

Authors:  Helen E Cullington; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.