Literature DB >> 16156645

Virtual screening against metalloenzymes for inhibitors and substrates.

John J Irwin1, Frank M Raushel, Brian K Shoichet.   

Abstract

Molecular docking uses the three-dimensional structure of a receptor to screen databases of small molecules for potential ligands, often based on energetic complementarity. For many docking scoring functions, which calculate nonbonded interactions, metalloenzymes are challenging because of the partial covalent nature of metal-ligand interactions. To investigate how well molecular docking can identify potential ligands of metalloenzymes using a "standard" scoring function, we have docked the MDL Drug Data Report (MDDR), a functionally annotated database of 95,000 small molecules, against the X-ray crystal structures of five metalloenzymes. These enzymes included three zinc proteases, the nickel analogue of an iron enzyme, and a molybdenum metalloenzyme. The ability of the docking program to retrospectively enrich the annotated ligands as high-scoring hits for each enzyme and to calculate proper geometries was evaluated. In all five systems, the annotated ligands within the MDDR were enriched at least 20 times over random. To test the approach prospectively, a sixth target, the zinc beta-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis, was screened against the fragment-like subset of the ZINC database. We purchased and tested 15 compounds from among the top 50 top-ranked ligands from docking, and found 5 inhibitors with apparent K(i) values less than 120 microM, the best of which was 2 microM. A more ambitious test still was predicting actual substrates for a seventh target, a Zn-dependent phosphotriesterase from Pseudomonas diminuta. Screening the Available Chemicals Directory (ACD) identified 25 thiophosphate esters as potential substrates within the top 100 ranked compounds. Eight of these, all previously uncharacterized for this enzyme, were acquired and tested, and all were confirmed experimentally as substrates. These results suggest that a simple, noncovalent scoring function may be used to identify inhibitors of at least some metalloenzymes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16156645     DOI: 10.1021/bi050801k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  48 in total

Review 1.  Drug discovery research targeting the CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4).

Authors:  Won-Tak Choi; Srinivas Duggineni; Yan Xu; Ziwei Huang; Jing An
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 7.446

2.  Function discovery and structural characterization of a methylphosphonate esterase.

Authors:  Dao Feng Xiang; Yury Patskovsky; Venkatesh V Nemmara; Rafael Toro; Steven C Almo; Frank M Raushel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking.

Authors:  Niu Huang; Brian K Shoichet; John J Irwin
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Structure-based function discovery of an enzyme for the hydrolysis of phosphorylated sugar lactones.

Authors:  Dao Feng Xiang; Peter Kolb; Alexander A Fedorov; Chengfu Xu; Elena V Fedorov; Tamari Narindoshivili; Howard J Williams; Brian K Shoichet; Steven C Almo; Frank M Raushel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go.

Authors:  N Moitessier; P Englebienne; D Lee; J Lawandi; C R Corbeil
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 8.739

6.  Molecular dynamic simulations of the metallo-beta-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis in the presence and absence of a tight-binding inhibitor.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury; Michael W Crowder; Stephen F Kingsmore; James J A Huntley
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Biochemical characterization of IMP-30, a metallo-β-lactamase with enhanced activity toward ceftazidime.

Authors:  Kevin M Pegg; Eleanor M Liu; Alecander E Lacuran; Peter Oelschlaeger
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-07-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Substrate Profile of the Phosphotriesterase Homology Protein from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Venkatesh V Nemmara; Dao Feng Xiang; A A Fedorov; E V Fedorov; Jeffrey B Bonanno; Steven C Almo; Frank M Raushel
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  DOCK 6: Impact of new features and current docking performance.

Authors:  William J Allen; Trent E Balius; Sudipto Mukherjee; Scott R Brozell; Demetri T Moustakas; P Therese Lang; David A Case; Irwin D Kuntz; Robert C Rizzo
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 3.376

10.  Benchmarking methods and data sets for ligand enrichment assessment in virtual screening.

Authors:  Jie Xia; Ermias Lemma Tilahun; Terry-Elinor Reid; Liangren Zhang; Xiang Simon Wang
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.608

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.