Literature DB >> 23046726

Obese and lean Zucker rats demonstrate differential sensitivity to rates of food reinforcement in a choice procedure.

Jessica L Buckley1, Erin B Rasmussen.   

Abstract

The obese Zucker rat carries two recessive fa alleles that result in the expression of an obese phenotype. Obese Zuckers have higher food intake than lean controls in free-feed studies in which rats have ready access to a large amount of one type of food. The present study examined differences in obese and lean Zucker rats using concurrent schedules of reinforcement, which more ecologically models food selection using two food choices that have limited, but generally predictable availability. Lever-pressing of ten lean (Fa/Fa or Fa/fa) and ten obese (fa/fa) Zucker rats was placed under three concurrent variable interval variable interval (conc VI VI) schedules of sucrose and carrot reinforcement, in which the programmed reinforcer ratios for 45-mg food pellets were 5:1, 1:1, and 1:5. Allocation of responses to the two food alternatives was characterized using the generalized matching equation, which allows sensitivity to reinforcer rates (a) and bias toward one alternative (log k) to be quantified. All rats showed a bias toward sucrose, though there were no differences between lean and obese Zucker rats. In addition, obese Zucker rats exhibited higher sensitivity to reinforcement rates than lean rats. This efficient pattern of responding was related to overall higher deliveries of food pellets. Effective matching for food, then, may be another behavioral pattern that contributes to an obese phenotype.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23046726      PMCID: PMC3513500          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  27 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The applied importance of research on the matching law.

Authors:  W D Pierce; W F Epling
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

4.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows.

Authors:  L R Matthews; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  oCRF and CRF (6-33) depress food but not water intake in the obese Zucker rat.

Authors:  C A Bjenning; K Rimvall
Journal:  Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord       Date:  2000-06

7.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Food and water intake, meal patterns and activity of obese and lean Zucker rats following chronic and acute treatment with delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  A Drewnowski; J A Grinker
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Effects of rimonabant on behavior maintained by progressive ratio schedules of sucrose reinforcement in obese Zucker (fa/fa) rats.

Authors:  Erin B Rasmussen; Sally L Huskinson
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.293

10.  Preferential effects of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist, SR 141716, on food intake and body weight gain of obese (fa/fa) compared to lean Zucker rats.

Authors:  S P Vickers; L J Webster; A Wyatt; C T Dourish; G A Kennett
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-03-11       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  The utility of behavioral economics in expanding the free-feed model of obesity.

Authors:  Erin B Rasmussen; Stephen H Robertson; Luis R Rodriguez
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Delay discounting as impaired valuation: Delayed rewards in an animal obesity model.

Authors:  David P Jarmolowicz; Jennifer L Hudnall; Luanne Hale; Stephen C Fowler; Marco Bortolato; Shea M Lemley; Michael J Sofis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rimonabant's reductive effects on high densities of food reinforcement, but not palatability, in lean and obese Zucker rats.

Authors:  Jessica L Buckley; Erin B Rasmussen
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  I can't wait: Methods for measuring and moderating individual differences in impulsive choice.

Authors:  Jennifer R Peterson; Catherine C Hill; Andrew T Marshall; Sarah L Stuebing; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Agric Food Ind Organ       Date:  2015-11-19

5.  Haloperidol and rimonabant increase delay discounting in rats fed high-fat and standard-chow diets.

Authors:  Steven R Boomhower; Erin B Rasmussen
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.293

6.  Impulsive-choice patterns for food in genetically lean and obese Zucker rats.

Authors:  Steven R Boomhower; Erin B Rasmussen; Tiffany S Doherty
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Incidental rewarding cues influence economic decisions in people with obesity.

Authors:  Jakob Simmank; Carsten Murawski; Stefan Bode; Annette Horstmann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.558

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.