Literature DB >> 16153576

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion with plate fixation as an outpatient procedure.

Jonathan R Stieber1, Kevin Brown, Gordon D Donald, Jason D Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Outpatient cervical spine surgery has previously been described for posterior laminoforaminotomy and anterior microdiscectomy with allograft fusion. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with plate fixation has not, to our knowledge, been described as an outpatient procedure.
PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ACDF with instrumentation when performed as an outpatient in a free-standing ambulatory surgical center. Additionally, the authors sought to determine any patient selection bias and its effect on outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: This study is a retrospective medical record review. PATIENT SAMPLE: The sample included all patients who underwent one or two level ACDF with plate fixation at levels C4-5 or below as an adjunct to autogenous iliac crest bone graft or structural allograft from 1998 to 2002 by the two senior authors. OUTCOME MEASURES: Complications were assessed clinically with special attention to dysphagia and respiratory complications. Inpatient lengths of stay and postoperative hospital admission or readmission were also measured.
METHODS: Thirty consecutive patients were treated at a free-standing ambulatory surgery center, whereas two control groups, each of 30 consecutive patients, had surgery performed in the hospital and were admitted overnight for observation. The first control group consisted of admitted patients before the commencement of patient selection for the outpatient group; the second control group was comprised of admitted patients who had surgery performed concurrently with the outpatient group. The study group was evaluated on the first postoperative day and 3 weeks after surgery.
RESULTS: Ninety patients underwent ACDF plate fixation at 140 different levels. Forty patients were treated at one level, and 50 were treated at two levels. The three groups were comparable in age, sex, and body mass index. There were no major complications. Seven patients (13%) had minor postoperative complications among the controls: transient dysphagia in three (5%) and graft donor site pain in four (14%). Three patients (10%) in the outpatient group had minor complications (all had dysphagia). Among the controls, four patients (7%) had increased length of stay owing to complications. Four patients (7%) in the combined control group were readmitted for early complications; no patient was admitted for a complication after outpatient surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, selection criteria for outpatient surgery included one or two level involvement C4-5 or lower, absence of myelopathy, subjective neck size, and estimated operative time. The data did not otherwise suggest a difference in the surgical populations. The outpatient group had a lower complication rate compared with the controls. This was likely the result of selection bias. Transient dysphagia was the most prevalent complication in the outpatient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16153576     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.01.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  23 in total

1.  [Anterior cervical fusion in the lower cervical spine. Locked vs nonlocked screw plate, pure cancellous bone vs tricortical strut].

Authors:  L Sándor; P Barzo; A Kuncz; P Elek
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Patient education in an ambulatory surgical center setting.

Authors:  Philip J York; Catherine Himo Gang; Sheeraz A Qureshi
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 3.  Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Avani S Vaishnav; Steven J McAnany
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

4.  Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: An Analysis of Readmissions from the New Jersey State Ambulatory Services Database.

Authors:  Shearwood McClelland; Peter G Passias; Thomas J Errico; R Shay Bess; Themistocles S Protopsaltis
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-01-10

5.  Instrumented outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: is it safe?

Authors:  Courtney S Sheperd; William F Young
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar

6.  Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database.

Authors:  Armin Arshi; Christopher Wang; Howard Y Park; Gideon W Blumstein; Zorica Buser; Jeffrey C Wang; Arya N Shamie; Don Y Park
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 7.  Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery.

Authors:  Evan D Sheha; Peter B Derman
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

Review 8.  Ambulatory surgery center ownership models.

Authors:  Neil Badlani
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

9.  Trends and Costs of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: a Comparison of Inpatient And Outpatient Procedures.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Anthony D'Oro; Zorica Buser; Jim A Youssef; Jong-Beom Park; Hans-Joerg Meisel; Darrel S Brodke; Jeffrey C Wang; S Tim Yoon
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2018

10.  Same-Day Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion-Our Protocol and Experience: Same-Day Discharge After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Suitable Patients has Similarly Low Readmission Rates as Admitted Patients.

Authors:  Kartik Shenoy; Abidemi Adenikinju; Ezra Dweck; Aaron J Buckland; John A Bendo
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.