Literature DB >> 18214399

[Anterior cervical fusion in the lower cervical spine. Locked vs nonlocked screw plate, pure cancellous bone vs tricortical strut].

L Sándor1, P Barzo, A Kuncz, P Elek.   

Abstract

Physical alterations in cervical fusions endanger healing. Experimentally we determined less stability loss in fixations using cancellous bone grafts than in those using tricortical grafts. Four hundred eighty-five Patients underwent anterior cervical fusion, for a total of 700 Segments. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) nonlocked H plate with autogenous cancellous bone, (2) nonlocked H plate with autogenous tricortical graft, (3) locked cervical plate with tricortical graft, and (4) stand-alone cage with cancellous bone. Evaluations included X-ray and random CT scan examinations. Our results suggest that anterior cervical fusions using nonlocked H screw plate systems with pure autogenous cancellous bone grafts provide the fastest (6 weeks) and most secure bone healing (P=0.00001), whereas fixations using nonlocked or locked screw plate systems and tricortical autograft require prolonged healing and develop nonunions more frequently. Complete consolidation was achieved using stand-alone cages filled with pure autogenous cancellous bone, but bony healing was delayed due to the cage. Rate of nonunions were: groups 1 and 4 0%, and groups 2 and 3 4.5% and 21%, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18214399     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1454-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  57 in total

1.  Effects of cervical cages on load distribution of cancellous core: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ee-Chon Teo; Kai Yang; Franz Konstantin Fuss; Kim-Kheng Lee; Tian-Xia Qiu; Hong-Wan Ng
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2004-06

Review 2.  Anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  V Gonugunta; A A Krishnaney; E C Benzel
Journal:  Neurol India       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.117

3.  Biomechanical study of anterior cervical corpectomy and step-cut grafting with bioabsorbable screws fixation in cadaveric cervical spine model.

Authors:  Jian Zhang; Xijing He; Haopeng Li; Dong Wang; Weidong Zhao; Jiehua Xu; Binshang Lan; Siyue Xu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  [In defense of anterior surgery in the treatment of serious injuries to the last 5 cervical vertebrae].

Authors:  J Senegas; J M Gauzere
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1976

5.  Fusion rate of anterior cervical plating after corpectomy.

Authors:  N S Cheng; P Y Lau; L K Sun; N M Wong
Journal:  J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong)       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.118

6.  [Surgically stabilizing "complex therapy" of unstable injury of the lower cervical spine].

Authors:  L Sándor
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1990-02

7.  Use of the microvascular free fibula transfer as a salvage reconstruction for failed anterior spine surgery due to chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Detlev Erdmann; Ricardo A Meade; Robert E Lins; Richard L McCann; William J Richardson; L Scott Levin
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Hollow bone cement filled with impacted cancellous bone as a substitute for bone grafts in cervical spine fusion.

Authors:  Hung-Chuan Pan; Yeou-Chih Wang; Cheng-Hung Lee; Dar-Yu Yang
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  [Diagnostics and therapy of fractures and fracture-dislocations of the vertebral column (author's transl)].

Authors:  J Böhler
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 0.942

10.  Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Authors:  Dino Samartzis; Francis H Shen; Craig Lyon; Mathew Phillips; Edward J Goldberg; Howard S An
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.