Literature DB >> 16140806

Radiographic and computed tomography analysis of cemented pegged polyethylene glenoid components in total shoulder replacement.

Edward H Yian1, Clément M L Werner, Richard W Nyffeler, Christian W Pfirrmann, Arun Ramappa, Atul Sukthankar, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Glenoid loosening continues to be the primary reason for failure of total shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, with use of a sensitive and reproducible imaging method, the radiographic and clinical results of total shoulder replacement with a pegged, cemented polyethylene glenoid implant.
METHODS: Forty-three patients (forty-seven shoulders) underwent a total shoulder replacement with a cemented polyethylene glenoid component with four threaded pegs. The patients were examined clinically, with fluoroscopically guided radiographs, and with computed tomography at an average of forty months. In addition to conventional scoring of radiographic lucency, an 18-point scoring system was used to quantify cement-peg lucencies in six zones of the back surface of the glenoid component as seen on computed tomography scans.
RESULTS: On the average, the absolute Constant score improved from 39 points preoperatively to 70 points at the time of follow-up (p = 0.0001) and the pain score improved from 5 to 13 points (p = 0.001). The mean active anterior elevation improved by 34 degrees (p = 0.001) and the mean abduction, by 46 degrees (p = 0.006). Two patients had symptomatic glenoid loosening requiring revision. Twenty-one of the forty-seven shoulders had radiographic lucency around the glenoid pegs, and nine had progression of the lucency by at least two grades. Computed tomography detected lucencies, primarily at the bone-cement interface, in thirty-six shoulders. The scores for the lucencies seen on the computed tomography scans were associated with the radiographic lucency scores (p < 0.001), pain scores (p = 0.04), and abduction strength (p = 0.02). Computed tomography was more sensitive than radiography with regard to identifying the number of pegs associated with lucency and the size of the lucencies. The overall reproducibility of the scoring based on the computed tomography was higher than that of the radiographic scoring.
CONCLUSIONS: Computed tomography provided a more sensitive and reproducible tool for the assessment of loosening of pegged glenoid components than did fluoroscopically guided conventional radiography. Further improvement in implant design and fixation technique appears to be necessary for long-term success of cemented glenoid components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140806     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  34 in total

1.  [Conventional x-ray after shoulder prosthesis].

Authors:  C Wurnig
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  Assessment of radiolucent lines in cemented shoulder hemi-arthroplasties: study of concordance and reproducibility.

Authors:  Carlos Torrens; Santos Martínez-Díaz; Aina Ruiz; Alberto Gines; Enrique Cáceres
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Axillary view: arthritic glenohumeral anatomy and changes after ream and run.

Authors:  Frederick A Matsen; Akash Gupta
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Clinical and radiological results of a cementless short stem shoulder prosthesis at minimum follow-up of two years.

Authors:  Marc Schnetzke; Sebastian Coda; Gilles Walch; Markus Loew
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Clinics in diagnostic imaging (167). Total shoulder arthroplasty glenoid component loosening with secondary rotator cuff failure.

Authors:  Tien Jin Tan; Ahmad Mohammad Aljefri; Marc Bruce Elliott; Savvas Nicolaou
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.858

6.  Peri-implant stress correlates with bone and cement morphology: Micro-FE modeling of implanted cadaveric glenoids.

Authors:  Hwabok Wee; April D Armstrong; Wesley W Flint; Allen R Kunselman; Gregory S Lewis
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Does Postoperative Glenoid Retroversion Affect the 2-Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Total Shoulder Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Benjamin C Service; Jason E Hsu; Jeremy S Somerson; Stacy M Russ; Frederick A Matsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Total shoulder replacement using a bone ingrowth central peg polyethylene glenoid component: a prospective clinical and computed tomography study with short- to mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Giovanni Merolla; Giovanni Ciaramella; Elisabetta Fabbri; Gilles Walch; Paolo Paladini; Giuseppe Porcellini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Construct damage and loosening around glenoid implants: A longitudinal micro-CT study of five cadaver specimens.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Jacob B Brenza; Emmanuel M Paul; April D Armstrong
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-28       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Failure mechanism of the all-polyethylene glenoid implant.

Authors:  Junaid Sarah; Gupta Sanjay; Sanghavi Sanjay; Anglin Carolyn; Roger Emery; Amis Andrew; Hansen Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.