Literature DB >> 31106522

A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.

Emmanuelle Robert1, Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau2, Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet1, Béatrice Swennen3, Roland Devlieger4,5,6.   

Abstract

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in Wallonia (the southern region of Belgium) in which a 20-question breastfeeding (BF) module was included in an immunization survey. The purpose of this paper is to compare exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) prevalences and BF practices for mothers giving birth in Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and non-BFHI maternity facilities. A total of 557 mothers responded to BF questions when their child was 18-24 months old; 26.7% of them delivered in a BFHI maternity facility. At discharge, a larger proportion of children were exclusively breastfed if they were born in a BFHI maternity facility (76.5% vs. 65.8%, p = .02). The median duration of EBF (15.0 vs. 12.9 weeks, p = .3), and the proportion of children exclusively breastfed at 5 months (16.8% vs 15.8%, p = 1.0) were similar in both groups. Few mothers knew that EBF was recommended for the first 6 months of life (28.6% in BFHI vs 23.1% in non-BFHI, p = .2). For most groups of the population examined, the rates of BF tended to be higher in BFHI facilities, but many differences were not significant. More specifically, BFHI seemed to boost BF practices among mothers more likely to breastfeed, but the Initiative did not seem to trigger enhanced BF practices in mothers traditionally less likely to breastfeed (except for indifferent/negative partner's attitude and mothers of Belgian origin). Influencing the BF practices of mothers less likely to breastfeed requires a special attention with complementary actions in maternity facilities as well as in community services.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative; breastfeeding duration; breastfeeding initiation; breastfeeding promotion; exclusive breastfeeding; public health

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31106522      PMCID: PMC6859970          DOI: 10.1111/mcn.12845

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Nutr        ISSN: 1740-8695            Impact factor:   3.092


  36 in total

Review 1.  The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative as an Intervention to Improve Breastfeeding Rates: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Abigail Howe-Heyman; Melanie Lutenbacher
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2016-01-22       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  Breastfeeding and the use of human milk: an analysis of the American Academy of Pediatrics 2012 Breastfeeding Policy Statement.

Authors:  Arthur I Eidelman
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 3.  Impact of the Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative on breastfeeding and child health outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rafael Pérez-Escamilla; Josefa L Martinez; Sofia Segura-Pérez
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  The Baby Friendly Hospital Initiative and breast feeding rates in Scotland.

Authors:  M Broadfoot; J Britten; D M Tappin; J M MacKenzie
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.747

5.  The neglect of nutrition in medical education: a firsthand look.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Morris
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Surveying the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of District of Columbia ACOG members related to breastfeeding.

Authors:  Alexandra M Sims; Sahira A Long; Jennifer A F Tender; Michal A Young
Journal:  Breastfeed Med       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect.

Authors:  Cesar G Victora; Rajiv Bahl; Aluísio J D Barros; Giovanny V A França; Susan Horton; Julia Krasevec; Simon Murch; Mari Jeeva Sankar; Neff Walker; Nigel C Rollins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Prevalence of breastfeeding in industrialized countries.

Authors:  G Ibanez; N Martin; M Denantes; M-J Saurel-Cubizolles; V Ringa; A-M Magnier
Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 1.019

9.  Are breastfeeding rates higher among mothers delivering in Baby Friendly accredited maternity units in the UK?

Authors:  Suzanne Bartington; Lucy J Griffiths; A Rosemary Tate; Carol Dezateux
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 10.  Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices?

Authors:  Nigel C Rollins; Nita Bhandari; Nemat Hajeebhoy; Susan Horton; Chessa K Lutter; Jose C Martines; Ellen G Piwoz; Linda M Richter; Cesar G Victora
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-01-30       Impact factor: 202.731

View more
  2 in total

1.  A comparison of exclusive breastfeeding in Belgian maternity facilities with and without Baby-friendly Hospital status.

Authors:  Emmanuelle Robert; Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau; Michèle Dramaix-Wilmet; Béatrice Swennen; Roland Devlieger
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  The role of breastfeeding promotion in German hospitals for exclusive breastfeeding duration.

Authors:  Nele Hockamp; Erika Sievers; Philipp Hülk; Henrik Rudolf; Silvia Rudloff; Thomas Lücke; Mathilde Kersting
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 3.092

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.