Literature DB >> 16140192

Tendon reattachment to a metallic implant using an allogenic bone plate augmented with rhOP-1 vs. autogenous cancellous bone and marrow in a canine model.

Carlos A Higuera1, Nozomu Inoue, Jonathan S Lim, Renwen Zhang, Nena Dimaano, Frank J Frassica, Edmund Y S Chao.   

Abstract

Functionality of endoprosthetic reconstruction may be improved through secure and lasting soft tissue reattachment directly to the metallic implant surface. Tendon reattachment to the metallic surface of a titanium implant (enhanced tendon anchor, ETA) using autogenous bone plate as an interpositional structure between the tendon and metal, augmented with autogenous bone chips and marrow, provided successful mechanical and functional outcome. However, preparation of the autogenous bone plate is not practical in a clinical setting, but application of an allogenic bone plate could be an alternative. The autogenous cancellous bone and marrow may also be substituted by bone growth factors so that no autogenous bone graft is required. We hypothesized that the reconstitution of the direct tendon-bone insertion morphology in tendon reattachment to metallic implant could be achieved using allogenic cancellous bone plate augmented with autogenous cancellous bone and marrow, and that the autogenous bone grafts could be replaced by recombinant human osteogenic protein-1 (rhOP-1). In two canine groups the supraspinatus tendon was reattached unilaterally to a modified ETA implant with a highly porous metallic surface known as Tritanium Dimensionalized Metal. Allogenic bone plates saturated with rhOP-1-collagen putty were used in the OP-1 (OP) group, while plates saturated with autogenous cancellous bone and marrow were used in the bone marrow (BM) group. Functional, radiographical, mechanical and histomorphological analysis results were compared between both groups. At 15 weeks, gait analysis showed 78% and 81% recovery of preoperative weight-bearing in OP and BM groups, respectively. The calcified area around the tendon in OP group was 5.2 times larger than that in BM group (p<0.001). The ultimate tensile strength of the reattachment was 24% and 38% of the intact contralateral side in OP and BM groups, respectively, without significant difference between them. There was evidence of tendon-bone insertion transitional zones, tissue ingrowth and adhesion to the metallic surface in both groups. In conclusion, the use of the allograft combined with rhOP-1 had a similar effect as combined with autogenous cancellous bone and marrow in the tendon reattachment to the metallic surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16140192     DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  10 in total

1.  Proximal and total humerus reconstruction with the use of an aortograft mesh.

Authors:  German A Marulanda; Eric Henderson; David Cheong; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Extended healing validation of an artificial tendon to connect the quadriceps muscle to the Tibia: 180-day study.

Authors:  Alan J Melvin; Alan S Litsky; Joel L Mayerson; Keith Stringer; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-16       Impact factor: 3.494

3.  An artificial tendon to connect the quadriceps muscle to the tibia.

Authors:  Alan Melvin; Alan Litsky; Joel Mayerson; Keith Stringer; David Melvin; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  An artificial tendon with durable muscle interface.

Authors:  Alan Melvin; Alan Litsky; Joel Mayerson; David Witte; David Melvin; Natalia Juncosa-Melvin
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.494

5.  Biological aspects of rotator cuff healing.

Authors:  Britt Wildemann; Franka Klatte
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-04-01

6.  CORR Insights®: Does Patellar Tendon Repair With Gastrocnemius Flap Augmentation Effectively Restore Active Extension After Proximal Tibial Sarcoma Resection?

Authors:  Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Outcome after Reconstruction of the Proximal Tibia--Complications and Competing Risk Analysis.

Authors:  Stephan E Puchner; Paul Kutscha-Lissberg; Alexandra Kaider; Joannis Panotopoulos; Rudolf Puchner; Christoph Böhler; Gerhard Hobusch; Reinhard Windhager; Philipp T Funovics
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  From amputation to limb salvage reconstruction: evolution and role of the endoprosthesis in musculoskeletal oncology.

Authors:  John S Hwang; Anokhi D Mehta; Richard S Yoon; Kathleen S Beebe
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2013-09-22

9.  The mature athlete: aging tendon and ligament.

Authors:  Moira M McCarthy; Jo A Hannafin
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.843

10.  The influence of tantalum on human cell lineages important for healing in soft-tissue reattachment surgery: an in-vitro analysis.

Authors:  Edward C A Gee; Renato Eleotério; Laura M Bowker; Adnan Saithna; John A Hunt
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2019-10-28
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.