Literature DB >> 16139708

Isolated acetabular revision through the posterior approach: short-term results after revision of a recalled acetabular component.

David W Manning1, Brent A Ponce, Peter P Chiang, William H Harris, Dennis W Burke.   

Abstract

Isolated acetabular revision is commonly associated with high rates of postoperative dislocation. We hypothesize that the dislocation rate in a series of isolated acetabular revisions for loosening of recalled acetabular components is low when strict intraoperative stability testing is coupled with re-repair of the piriformis tendon. Twenty-six isolated revisions of aseptic, loose recalled acetabular components were performed through the posterior approach by a single surgeon. All piriformis tendon and posterior capsular repairs from the index operation were considered intact at the time of revision. The piriformis tendon was re-repaired in each revision case. The average revision acetabular component was 3 mm larger than the index component. In this select group of isolated acetabular revisions, strict intraoperative stability testing and re-repair of the piriformis tendon yielded zero dislocations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16139708     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2004.11.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  7 in total

1.  Failure of the Durom Metasul acetabular component.

Authors:  William T Long; Manish Dastane; Michael J Harris; Zhinian Wan; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  A dual-mobility cup reduces risk of dislocation in isolated acetabular revisions.

Authors:  Roberto Civinini; Christian Carulli; Fabrizio Matassi; Lorenzo Nistri; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Complications Are Not Increased With Acetabular Revision of Metal-on-metal Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Colin T Penrose; Thorsten M Seyler; Samuel S Wellman; Michael P Bolognesi; Paul F Lachiewicz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Alumina heads minimize wear and femoral osteolysis progression after isolated simple acetabular revision.

Authors:  Philippe Hernigou; Nicolas Dupuy; Olivier Pidet; Yashuhiro Homma; Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Outcomes of isolated acetabular revision.

Authors:  Bryan M Lawless; William L Healy; Sanjeev Sharma; Richard Iorio
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty does equally well in osteonecrosis and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Manish R Dastane; William T Long; Zhinian Wan; Lisa Chao; Lawrence D Dorr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  The Survival of Well-Fixed Cementless Femoral Component After Isolated Acetabular Component Revision.

Authors:  Mehmet Ekinci; Yucel Bilgin; Yasin Sayar; Omer Naci Ergin; Ahmet Salduz; Turgut Akgul; Irfan Ozturk
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.