Literature DB >> 16137638

Evidence that ligand binding is a key determinant of Ah receptor-mediated transcriptional activity.

Iain A Murray1, Rashmeet K Reen, Nathan Leathery, Preeti Ramadoss, Laura Bonati, Frank J Gonzalez, Jeffrey M Peters, Gary H Perdew.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) mediates the biological activity of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Whether the AhR can mediate enhanced transcriptional activity in the absence of ligand binding has not been established. Hepatocytes from AhR-null (AhR-KO) and wild-type (AhR-WT) neonatal mice were immortalized with Simian virus 40. Two point mutants of the AhR, A375I and A375F, were generated to test the hypothesis that the AhR requires ligand binding to exhibit significant transcriptional activity, both mutants fail to bind ligand or exhibit enhanced activity in cells exposed to AhR ligands. Upon transient, co-expression of ARNT with AhR-A375I or AhR-A375F in AhR-KO cells, these mutants exhibited significant ligand-independent transcriptional activity. However, in CV-1 cells, which others have previously shown to contain relatively high levels of AhR ligand(s), these AhR mutants exhibit essentially no constitutive activity. These results indicate that while the AhR can potentially exhibit activity in the absence of ligand binding, the high constitutive receptor activity observed in many cell lines appears to be due to the presence of endogenous AhR ligands.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16137638     DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2005.07.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys        ISSN: 0003-9861            Impact factor:   4.013


  19 in total

1.  Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Pandini; Michael S Denison; Yujuan Song; Anatoly A Soshilov; Laura Bonati
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2007-01-23       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Computational approaches to shed light on molecular mechanisms in biological processes.

Authors:  Giorgio Moro; Laura Bonati; Maurizio Bruschi; Ugo Cosentino; Luca De Gioia; Pier Carlo Fantucci; Alessandro Pandini; Elena Papaleo; Demetrio Pitea; Gloria A A Saracino; Giuseppe Zampella
Journal:  Theor Chem Acc       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 1.702

Review 3.  Aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligands in cancer: friend and foe.

Authors:  Iain A Murray; Andrew D Patterson; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 60.716

4.  New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.

Authors:  Ilaria Motto; Annalisa Bordogna; Anatoly A Soshilov; Michael S Denison; Laura Bonati
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.956

Review 5.  Xenobiotic metabolism, disposition, and regulation by receptors: from biochemical phenomenon to predictors of major toxicities.

Authors:  Curtis J Omiecinski; John P Vanden Heuvel; Gary H Perdew; Jeffrey M Peters
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Molecular modeling of the AhR structure and interactions can shed light on ligand-dependent activation and transformation mechanisms.

Authors:  Laura Bonati; Dario Corrada; Sara Giani Tagliabue; Stefano Motta
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02-01

7.  Development of novel CH223191-based antagonists of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  Eun-Young Choi; Hyosung Lee; R W Cameron Dingle; Kyung Bo Kim; Hollie I Swanson
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.

Authors:  Domenico Fraccalvieri; Anatoly A Soshilov; Sibel I Karchner; Diana G Franks; Alessandro Pandini; Laura Bonati; Mark E Hahn; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 9.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex and the control of gene expression.

Authors:  Timothy V Beischlag; J Luis Morales; Brett D Hollingshead; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.807

10.  Ah receptor represses acute-phase response gene expression without binding to its cognate response element.

Authors:  Rushang D Patel; Iain A Murray; Colin A Flaveny; Ann Kusnadi; Gary H Perdew
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2009-03-30       Impact factor: 5.662

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.