Literature DB >> 17223691

Structural and functional characterization of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor ligand binding domain by homology modeling and mutational analysis.

Alessandro Pandini1, Michael S Denison, Yujuan Song, Anatoly A Soshilov, Laura Bonati.   

Abstract

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) is a ligand-dependent transcription factor that is activated by a structurally diverse array of synthetic and natural chemicals, including toxic halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons such as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD). Analysis of the molecular events occurring in the AhR ligand binding and activation processes requires structural information on the AhR Per-Arnt-Sim (PAS) B-containing ligand binding domain, for which no experimentally determined structure has been reported. With the availability of extensive structural information on homologous PAS-containing proteins, a reliable model of the mouse AhR PAS B domain was developed by comparative modeling techniques. The PAS domain structures of the functionally related hypoxia-inducible factor 2alpha (HIF-2alpha) and AhR nuclear translocator (ARNT) proteins, which exhibit the highest degree of sequence identity and similarity with AhR, were chosen to develop a two-template model. To confirm the features of the modeled domain, the effects of point mutations in selected residue positions on both TCDD binding to the AhR and TCDD-dependent transformation and DNA binding were analyzed. Mutagenesis and functional analysis results are consistent with the proposed model and confirm that the cavity modeled in the interior of the domain is indeed involved in ligand binding. Moreover, the physicochemical characteristics of some residues and of their mutants, along with the effects of mutagenesis on TCDD and DNA binding, also suggest some key features that are required for ligand binding and activation of mAhR at a molecular level, thus providing a framework for further studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17223691      PMCID: PMC2860805          DOI: 10.1021/bi061460t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  53 in total

1.  Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  D T Jones
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-09-17       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Definition of a dioxin receptor mutant that is a constitutive activator of transcription: delineation of overlapping repression and ligand binding functions within the PAS domain.

Authors:  J McGuire; K Okamoto; M L Whitelaw; H Tanaka; L Poellinger
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-09-10       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design.

Authors:  J Liang; H Edelsbrunner; C Woodward
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 5.  The Ah receptor: a regulator of the biochemical and toxicological actions of structurally diverse chemicals.

Authors:  M S Denison; S Heath-Pagliuso
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  Structure of a flavin-binding plant photoreceptor domain: insights into light-mediated signal transduction.

Authors:  S Crosson; K Moffat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  The silencing mediator of retinoic acid and thyroid hormone receptors can interact with the aryl hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor but fails to repress Ah receptor-dependent gene expression.

Authors:  S Renée Rushing; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2002-07-15       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  R Sánchez; A Sali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Identification of functional domains of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  B N Fukunaga; M R Probst; S Reisz-Porszasz; O Hankinson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1995-12-08       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  Physicochemical and immunocytochemical analysis of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator: characterization of two monoclonal antibodies to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator.

Authors:  N G Hord; G H Perdew
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.436

View more
  49 in total

1.  Ligand-binding properties of a juvenile hormone receptor, Methoprene-tolerant.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe Charles; Thomas Iwema; V Chandana Epa; Keiko Takaki; Jan Rynes; Marek Jindra
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Mechanism-based common reactivity pattern (COREPA) modelling of aryl hydrocarbon receptor binding affinity.

Authors:  P I Petkov; J C Rowlands; R Budinsky; B Zhao; M S Denison; O Mekenyan
Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  An Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor from the Salamander Ambystoma mexicanum Exhibits Low Sensitivity to 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin.

Authors:  Jenny Shoots; Domenico Fraccalvieri; Diana G Franks; Michael S Denison; Mark E Hahn; Laura Bonati; Wade H Powell
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Binding studies using Pichia pastoris expressed human aryl hydrocarbon receptor and aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator proteins.

Authors:  Yujuan Zheng; Jinghang Xie; Xin Huang; Jin Dong; Miki S Park; William K Chan
Journal:  Protein Expr Purif       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 1.650

5.  New aryl hydrocarbon receptor homology model targeted to improve docking reliability.

Authors:  Ilaria Motto; Annalisa Bordogna; Anatoly A Soshilov; Michael S Denison; Laura Bonati
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.956

6.  And Now for Something Completely Different: Diversity in Ligand-Dependent Activation of Ah Receptor Responses.

Authors:  Michael S Denison; Samantha C Faber
Journal:  Curr Opin Toxicol       Date:  2017-02

7.  Molecular determinants of species-specific agonist and antagonist activity of a substituted flavone towards the aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

Authors:  E C Henry; T A Gasiewicz
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.013

8.  Modeling of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) ligand binding domain and its utility in virtual ligand screening to predict new AhR ligands.

Authors:  William H Bisson; Daniel C Koch; Edmond F O'Donnell; Sammy M Khalil; Nancy I Kerkvliet; Robert L Tanguay; Ruben Abagyan; Siva Kumar Kolluri
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  Differential consequences of two distinct AhR ligands on innate and adaptive immune responses to influenza A virus.

Authors:  Jennifer L H Wheeler; Kyle C Martin; Emily Resseguie; B Paige Lawrence
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 4.849

10.  Comparative analysis of homology models of the AH receptor ligand binding domain: verification of structure-function predictions by site-directed mutagenesis of a nonfunctional receptor.

Authors:  Domenico Fraccalvieri; Anatoly A Soshilov; Sibel I Karchner; Diana G Franks; Alessandro Pandini; Laura Bonati; Mark E Hahn; Michael S Denison
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.