Literature DB >> 1613759

Estimates of the frequency of chromosome abnormalities detectable in unselected newborns using moderate levels of banding.

P A Jacobs1, C Browne, N Gregson, C Joyce, H White.   

Abstract

Data on structural chromosome abnormalities identified during prenatal diagnosis were used to estimate the number of such abnormalities that would be detectable in an unselected series of newborns using moderate levels of banding (400 to 500 bands). These estimates were compared with the rates detected in nonbanded surveys of newborns. Between 1976 and 1990 prenatal diagnosis using banding techniques was carried out in our laboratory on 14,677 women aged 35 and over. Among these, we detected 112 structural rearrangements, 32 unbalanced and 80 balanced. These figures were adjusted by two methods to give an estimate of the frequency of structural abnormalities in the newborn. Our data suggest that the use of moderate levels of banding increases the frequency of unbalanced structural abnormalities from 0.052 to 0.061% and of balanced structural abnormalities from 0.212 to 0.522%. Thus, the total number of chromosome abnormalities detectable in the newborn is increased from 0.60% in unbanded preparations to 0.92% in banded preparations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1613759      PMCID: PMC1015848          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.29.2.103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  8 in total

1.  United States survey on chromosome mosaicism and pseudomosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  L Y Hsu; T E Perlis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Cytogenetic screening of a new-born population.

Authors:  I L Hansteen; K Varslot; J Steen-Johnsen; S Langård
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  A G-band study of chromosomes in liveborn infants.

Authors:  K E Buckton; M L O'Riordan; S Ratcliffe; J Slight; M Mitchell; S McBeath; A J Keay; D Barr; M Short
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 1.670

4.  Incidence of chromosome abnormalities in newborn children. Comparison between incidences in 1969-1974 and 1980-1982 in the same area.

Authors:  J Nielsen; M Wohlert; J Faaborg-Andersen; K B Hansen; L Hvidman; B Krag-Olsen; I Moulvad; P Videbech
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  How much difference does chromosome banding make? Adjustments in prevalence and mutation rates of human structural cytogenetic abnormalities.

Authors:  E B Hook; N P Healy; A M Willey
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 1.670

6.  Rates of mutant structural chromosome rearrangements in human fetuses: data from prenatal cytogenetic studies and associations with maternal age and parental mutagen exposure.

Authors:  E B Hook; D M Schreinemachers; A M Willey; P K Cross
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Mutation rates of structural chromosome rearrangements in man.

Authors:  P A Jacobs
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Chromosome analysis on 930 consecutive newborn children using quinacrine fluorescent banding technique.

Authors:  C C Lin; M M Gedeon; P Griffith; W K Smink; D R Newton; L Wilkie; L M Sewell
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1976-03-12       Impact factor: 4.132

  8 in total
  78 in total

1.  Influences of chromosome size, gene density and nuclear position on the frequency of constitutional translocations in the human population.

Authors:  Wendy A Bickmore; Peter Teague
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Large clinically consequential imbalances detected at the breakpoints of apparently balanced and inherited chromosome rearrangements.

Authors:  Sarah T South; Lyndsey Rector; Emily Aston; Leslie Rowe; Samuel P Yang
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Anterior segment dysgenesis in mosaic Turner syndrome.

Authors:  I C Lloyd; P M Haigh; J Clayton-Smith; P Clayton; D A Price; A E Ridgway; D Donnai
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes.

Authors:  S M Gribble; E Prigmore; D C Burford; K M Porter; Bee Ling Ng; E J Douglas; H Fiegler; P Carr; D Kalaitzopoulos; S Clegg; R Sandstrom; I K Temple; S A Youings; N S Thomas; N R Dennis; P A Jacobs; J A Crolla; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  Parental and chromosomal origin of unbalanced de novo structural chromosome abnormalities in man.

Authors:  N Simon Thomas; Miranda Durkie; Berendine Van Zyl; Richard Sanford; Gemma Potts; Sheila Youings; Nicholas Dennis; Patricia Jacobs
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort.

Authors:  Julia Baptista; Catherine Mercer; Elena Prigmore; Susan M Gribble; Nigel P Carter; Viv Maloney; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; John A Crolla
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 7.  Copy number variants, aneuploidies, and human disease.

Authors:  Christa Lese Martin; Brianne E Kirkpatrick; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 8.  Chromosome analysis: what and when to request.

Authors:  F H Sharkey; E Maher; D R FitzPatrick
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.791

9.  Cytogenetic and epidemiological findings in Down syndrome, England and Wales 1989 to 1993. National Down Syndrome Cytogenetic Register and the Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists.

Authors:  D Mutton; E Alberman; E B Hook
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Balanced into array: genome-wide array analysis in 54 patients with an apparently balanced de novo chromosome rearrangement and a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilse Feenstra; Nicolien Hanemaaijer; Birgit Sikkema-Raddatz; Helger Yntema; Trijnie Dijkhuizen; Dorien Lugtenberg; Joke Verheij; Andrew Green; Roel Hordijk; William Reardon; Bert de Vries; Han Brunner; Ernie Bongers; Nicole de Leeuw; Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.