Literature DB >> 20595628

Large clinically consequential imbalances detected at the breakpoints of apparently balanced and inherited chromosome rearrangements.

Sarah T South1, Lyndsey Rector, Emily Aston, Leslie Rowe, Samuel P Yang.   

Abstract

When a chromosome abnormality is identified in a child with a developmental delay and/or multiple congenital anomalies and the chromosome rearrangement appears balanced, follow-up studies often examine both parents for this rearrangement. If either clinically unaffected parent has a chromosome abnormality with a banding pattern identical to the affected child's study, then it is assumed that the chromosome rearrangement is balanced and directly inherited from the normal carrier parent. It is therefore unlikely that the chromosome rearrangement is responsible for the child's clinical presentation. We present two unrelated cases in which an identical and apparently balanced abnormal chromosome banding pattern was identified in both an affected child and an unaffected parent of that child. Despite the identical banding patterns, molecular characterization through genomic microarray and fluorescence in situ hybridization showed the parent to be balanced whereas the affected child was significantly unbalanced. These two cases emphasize the utility of genomic microarray for further characterization of apparently balanced inherited chromosome rearrangements and caution against the assumption that identical banding patterns between a child and parent represent identical genomic rearrangements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20595628      PMCID: PMC2928439          DOI: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Diagn        ISSN: 1525-1578            Impact factor:   5.568


  12 in total

1.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of apparently balanced translocation reveals cryptic complex chromosomal rearrangements with unexpected level of complexity.

Authors:  Philippos C Patsalis; Paola Evangelidou; Spyros Charalambous; Carolina Sismani
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  The complex nature of constitutional de novo apparently balanced translocations in patients presenting with abnormal phenotypes.

Authors:  S M Gribble; E Prigmore; D C Burford; K M Porter; Bee Ling Ng; E J Douglas; H Fiegler; P Carr; D Kalaitzopoulos; S Clegg; R Sandstrom; I K Temple; S A Youings; N S Thomas; N R Dennis; P A Jacobs; J A Crolla; N P Carter
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.318

3.  De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Breakpoint mapping and array CGH in translocations: comparison of a phenotypically normal and an abnormal cohort.

Authors:  Julia Baptista; Catherine Mercer; Elena Prigmore; Susan M Gribble; Nigel P Carter; Viv Maloney; N Simon Thomas; Patricia A Jacobs; John A Crolla
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 5.  Mendelian cytogenetics. Chromosome rearrangements associated with mendelian disorders.

Authors:  N Tommerup
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.318

6.  A new genomic mechanism leading to cri-du-chat syndrome.

Authors:  Sarah T South; Jeffrey J Swensen; Teresa Maxwell; Alan Rope; Arthur R Brothman; Zhong Chen
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 2.802

7.  Detection of deletions in de novo "balanced" chromosome rearrangements: further evidence for their role in phenotypic abnormalities.

Authors:  Caroline Astbury; Laurie A Christ; David J Aughton; Suzanne B Cassidy; Arun Kumar; Evan E Eichler; Stuart Schwartz
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Cryptic genomic imbalances in de novo and inherited apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements: array CGH study of 47 unrelated cases.

Authors:  Caroline Schluth-Bolard; Bruno Delobel; Damien Sanlaville; Odile Boute; Jean-Marie Cuisset; Sylvie Sukno; Audrey Labalme; Bénédicte Duban-Bedu; Ghislaine Plessis; Sylvie Jaillard; Christèle Dubourg; Catherine Henry; Josette Lucas; Sylvie Odent; Laurent Pasquier; Henri Copin; Philippe Latour; Marie-Pierre Cordier; Gwenaël Nadeau; Marianne Till; Patrick Edery; Joris Andrieux
Journal:  Eur J Med Genet       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 2.708

9.  Characterization of apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangements from the developmental genome anatomy project.

Authors:  Anne W Higgins; Fowzan S Alkuraya; Amy F Bosco; Kerry K Brown; Gail A P Bruns; Diana J Donovan; Robert Eisenman; Yanli Fan; Chantal G Farra; Heather L Ferguson; James F Gusella; David J Harris; Steven R Herrick; Chantal Kelly; Hyung-Goo Kim; Shotaro Kishikawa; Bruce R Korf; Shashikant Kulkarni; Eric Lally; Natalia T Leach; Emma Lemyre; Janine Lewis; Azra H Ligon; Weining Lu; Richard L Maas; Marcy E MacDonald; Steven D P Moore; Roxanna E Peters; Bradley J Quade; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Irfan Saadi; Yiping Shen; Jay Shendure; Robin E Williamson; Cynthia C Morton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Cryptic deletions are a common finding in "balanced" reciprocal and complex chromosome rearrangements: a study of 59 patients.

Authors:  M De Gregori; R Ciccone; P Magini; T Pramparo; S Gimelli; J Messa; F Novara; A Vetro; E Rossi; P Maraschio; M C Bonaglia; C Anichini; G B Ferrero; M Silengo; E Fazzi; A Zatterale; R Fischetto; C Previderé; S Belli; A Turci; G Calabrese; F Bernardi; E Meneghelli; M Riegel; M Rocchi; S Guerneri; F Lalatta; L Zelante; C Romano; M Fichera; T Mattina; G Arrigo; M Zollino; S Giglio; F Lonardo; A Bonfante; A Ferlini; F Cifuentes; H Van Esch; L Backx; A Schinzel; J R Vermeesch; O Zuffardi
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 6.318

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.