Literature DB >> 1613626

Quantitation of in situ contact areas at the glenohumeral joint: a biomechanical study.

L J Soslowsky1, E L Flatow, L U Bigliani, R J Pawluk, G A Ateshian, V C Mow.   

Abstract

Glenohumeral arthritis may result from abnormal articular mechanics, and shoulder reconstructive procedures often rely implicitly on the belief that the restoration of normal articular mechanics is required to obtain satisfactory clinical results. Despite this, limited knowledge of normal or pathologic glenohumeral joint articular mechanics and contact is available. This study uses a stereophotogrammetry technique to determine contact areas in normal cadaver glenohumeral joints with intact ligaments and capsule through a large range of motion using simulated forces of the four rotator cuff muscles and three deltoid heads. All shoulders were first elevated to their maximum elevation in the scapular plane at an external rotation (starting rotation = 40 +/- 8 degrees), which allowed each shoulder to attain its maximal elevation in the scapular plane, and then repeated at 20 degrees internal to this rotation. Contact areas consistently increased with increasing elevation until 120 degrees to an average of 5.07 cm2 before decreasing with further increased elevation to an average of 2.59 cm2 at 180 degrees of total arm elevation. At 20 degrees internal to the starting rotation, contact areas reached high values 60 degrees earlier (averaged 4.56 cm2 at 60 degrees of total arm elevation) and then remained fairly constant through 120 degrees before decreasing with further increased elevation to 2.51 cm2 at 180 degrees total arm elevation. With increasing elevation in the external starting rotation, humeral head contact dramatically migrates from an inferior region to a superocentral-posterior region while glenoid contact shifts posteriorly. When the humeral shaft is positioned 20 degrees internal to the starting rotation, humeral head contact shifts from inferocentral-anterior to superocentral-posterior regions. Simultaneously, a similar posterior shift in glenoid contact is observed. Furthermore, whereas only a small portion of the humeral head surface area is in contact in any given position, contact on the glenoid surface is much more uniformly distributed over its entire articulating surface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1613626     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100100407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  22 in total

1.  Pathophysiology of anterior shoulder instability.

Authors:  G M McCluskey; B A Getz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Morphological analysis of the glenoid version in the axial plane according to age.

Authors:  Julia Bouchaib; Philippe Clavert; Jean-François Kempf; Jean-Luc Kahn
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2013-11-30       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Towards the development of a novel experimental shoulder simulator with rotating scapula and individually controlled muscle forces simulating the rotator cuff.

Authors:  Daniel Baumgartner; Daniel Tomas; Lukas Gossweiler; Walter Siegl; Georg Osterhoff; Bernd Heinlein
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Anisotropy, inhomogeneity, and tension-compression nonlinearity of human glenohumeral cartilage in finite deformation.

Authors:  Chun-Yuh Huang; Anna Stankiewicz; Gerard A Ateshian; Van C Mow
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 5.  Shoulder instability in the setting of bipolar (glenoid and humeral head) bone loss: the glenoid track concept.

Authors:  Suraj Trivedi; Michael L Pomerantz; Daniel Gross; Petar Golijanan; Matthew T Provencher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  In vivo shoulder function after surgical repair of a torn rotator cuff: glenohumeral joint mechanics, shoulder strength, clinical outcomes, and their interaction.

Authors:  Michael J Bey; Cathryn D Peltz; Kristin Ciarelli; Stephanie K Kline; George W Divine; Marnix van Holsbeeck; Stephanie Muh; Patricia A Kolowich; Terrence R Lock; Vasilios Moutzouros
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2011-07-07       Impact factor: 6.202

7.  Determination of a reference system for the three-dimensional study of the glenohumeral relationship.

Authors:  Tom R G M Verstraeten; Ellen Deschepper; Matthijs Jacxsens; Stig Walravens; Brecht De Coninck; Nicole Pouliart; Lieven F De Wilde
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The friction coefficient of shoulder joints remains remarkably low over 24 h of loading.

Authors:  Brian K Jones; Krista M Durney; Clark T Hung; Gerard A Ateshian
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Thickness Distribution of Glenohumeral Joint Cartilage.

Authors:  Christoph Schleich; Bernd Bittersohl; Gerald Antoch; Rüdiger Krauspe; Christoph Zilkens; Jörn Kircher
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Rotator cuff fatigue and glenohumeral kinematics in participants without shoulder dysfunction.

Authors:  Deydre S Teyhen; Joseph M Miller; Tansy R Middag; Edward J Kane
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.