Literature DB >> 12720034

Crop scents affect the occurrence of trophallaxis among forager honeybees.

M Gil1, W M Farina.   

Abstract

Previous evidence indicates that the recognition of the nectar delivered by forager honeybees within the colony may have been a primitive method of communication on food resources. Thus, the association between scent and reward that nectar foragers establish while they collect on a given flower species should be retrieved during trophallaxis, i.e., the transfer of liquid food by mouth, and, accordingly, foraging experience could affect the occurrence of these interactions inside the nest. We used experimental arenas to analyze how crop scents carried by donor bees affect trophallaxis among foragers, i.e., donors and receivers, which differ in their foraging experience. Results showed that whenever the foragers had collected unscented sugar solution from a feeder the presence of scents in the solution carried by donors did not affect the occurrence of trophallaxis nor its dynamics. In contrast, whenever the foragers had previous olfactory information, new scents present in the crop of the donors negatively affected the occurrence, but not the dynamics of trophallaxis. Thus, the association learned at the food source seems to be retrieved during trophallaxis, and it is possible that known scents present in the mouthparts of nest-mates may operate as a triggering stimulus to elicit trophallactic behavior within the hive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12720034     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-003-0412-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  4 in total

1.  Trophallaxis in filled-crop honeybees (Apis mellifera L.): food-loading time affects unloading behaviour.

Authors:  A J Wainselboim; W M Farina
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2000-06

2.  Trophallaxis in the honeybee, Apis mellifera : the interaction between viscosity and sucrose concentration of the transferred solution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Olfactory information transfer in the honeybee: compared efficiency of classical conditioning and early exposure.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Trophallaxis in forager honeybees (Apis mellifera): resource uncertainty enhances begging contacts?

Authors:  R J De Marco; W M Farina
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-01-24       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total
  6 in total

1.  Apis mellifera bees acquire long-term olfactory memories within the colony.

Authors:  Mariana Gil; Rodrigo J De Marco
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Non-random nectar unloading interactions between foragers and their receivers in the honeybee hive.

Authors:  Joaquín Goyret; Walter M Farina
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2005-10-28

3.  Vibrating the food receivers: a direct way of signal transmission in stingless bees (Melipona seminigra).

Authors:  Michael Hrncir; Veronika M Schmidt; Dirk Louis P Schorkopf; Stefan Jarau; Ronaldo Zucchi; Friedrich G Barth
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-04-01       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Behavioral responses of honey bees (Apis mellifera) to natural and synthetic xenobiotics in food.

Authors:  Ling-Hsiu Liao; Wen-Yen Wu; May R Berenbaum
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Aversive Foraging Conditions Modulate Downstream Social Food Sharing.

Authors:  Abby Basya Finkelstein; Gro V Amdam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sickness Behavior in Honey Bees.

Authors:  Nadia Kazlauskas; Martín Klappenbach; Amaicha M Depino; Fernando F Locatelli
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.566

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.