Literature DB >> 16132887

Stroke output variations calculated by esophageal Doppler is a reliable predictor of fluid response.

Fabrice Vallée1, Olivier Fourcade, Olivier De Soyres, Olivier Angles, Pascale Sanchez-Verlaan, Fabien Pillard, Nadia Smail, Michel Olivier, Michèle Genestal, Kamran Samii.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal Doppler allows continuous monitoring of stroke volume index (SVI) and corrected flow time (FTc). We hypothesized that variations in stroke output index SOI (SVI/FTc) during volume expansion can predict the hemodynamic response to subsequent fluid loading better than the static values. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Prospective study in the intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Fifty-one patients with circulatory failure were monitored by esophageal Doppler.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients who responded to a first fluid challenge received a second one. Patients who responded to both were classified as responders-responders, and those who did not respond to the second as responders-nonresponders. In these two groups we compared DeltaSVI, DeltaFTc, and DeltaSOI during each fluid challenge and also static values at the end of each fluid challenge. MEASUREMENTS AND
RESULTS: After the first fluid challenge DeltaSOI and DeltaSVI were significantly higher in patients who responded to subsequent volume expansion than in patients who no longer responded. ROC curves showed that DeltaSOI was a better predictor of fluid responsiveness than DeltaSVI. During volume expansion a DeltaSOI value of 11% discriminated between responders and nonresponders to subsequent volume expansion with a sensitivity of 91% and a specificity of 97%. There was no significant difference between the two groups for FTc value at the end of first fluid challenge.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of DeltaSOI during fluid challenge predicts response to subsequent fluid challenge and FTc is not a reliable indicator of cardiac preload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132887     DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2768-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Intensive Care Med        ISSN: 0342-4642            Impact factor:   17.440


  23 in total

1.  Esophageal Doppler ultrasound monitor versus pulmonary artery catheter in the hemodynamic management of critically ill surgical patients.

Authors:  A K Madan; V V UyBarreta; S Aliabadi-Wahle; R Jesperson; R S Hartz; L M Flint; S M Steinberg
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-04

2.  Esophageal Doppler monitor determinations of cardiac output and preload during cardiac operations.

Authors:  C J DiCorte; P Latham; P E Greilich; M V Cooley; P A Grayburn; M E Jessen
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Relation between respiratory changes in arterial pulse pressure and fluid responsiveness in septic patients with acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  F Michard; S Boussat; D Chemla; N Anguel; A Mercat; Y Lecarpentier; C Richard; M R Pinsky; J L Teboul
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures.

Authors:  R Venn; A Steele; P Richardson; J Poloniecki; M Grounds; P Newman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 9.166

5.  A comparison of the use of transoesophageal Doppler and thermodilution techniques for cardiac output determination.

Authors:  C Keyl; G Rödig; P Lemberger; J Hobbhahn
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Training is required to improve the reliability of esophageal Doppler to measure cardiac output in critically ill patients.

Authors:  J Y Lefrant; P Bruelle; A G Aya; G Saïssi; M Dauzat; J E de La Coussaye; J J Eledjam
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 17.440

7.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Stroke volume variations for assessment of cardiac responsiveness to volume loading in mechanically ventilated patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Reuter; Thomas W Felbinger; Christian Schmidt; Erich Kilger; Oliver Goedje; Peter Lamm; Alwin E Goetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2002-03-20       Impact factor: 17.440

9.  [Monitoring cardiac output: esophageal doppler vs thermodilution].

Authors:  D Leone; G Servillo; E De Robertis; F Rossano; R Tufano
Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Goal-directed intraoperative fluid administration reduces length of hospital stay after major surgery.

Authors:  Tong J Gan; Andrew Soppitt; Mohamed Maroof; Habib el-Moalem; Kerri M Robertson; Eugene Moretti; Peter Dwane; Peter S A Glass
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  13 in total

1.  The FTc is not an accurate marker of left ventricular preload.

Authors:  Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Assessing fluid responsiveness with esophageal Doppler dynamic indices: concepts and methods.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Year in review in intensive care medicine. 2005. I. Acute respiratory failure and acute lung injury, ventilation, hemodynamics, education, renal failure.

Authors:  Peter Andrews; Elie Azoulay; Massimo Antonelli; Laurent Brochard; Christian Brun-Buisson; Daniel de Backer; Geoffrey Dobb; Jean-Yves Fagon; Herwig Gerlach; Johan Groeneveld; Jordi Mancebo; Philipp Metnitz; Stefano Nava; Jerome Pugin; Michael Pinsky; Peter Radermacher; Christian Richard; Robert Tasker
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].

Authors:  U Wittkowski; C Spies; M Sander; J Erb; A Feldheiser; C von Heymann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Ultrasound Assessment of the Change in Carotid Corrected Flow Time in Fluid Responsiveness in Undifferentiated Shock.

Authors:  Igor Barjaktarevic; William E Toppen; Scott Hu; Elizabeth Aquije Montoya; Stephanie Ong; Russell Buhr; Ian J David; Tisha Wang; Talayeh Rezayat; Steven Y Chang; David Elashoff; Daniela Markovic; David Berlin; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Additional hemodynamic measurements with an esophageal Doppler monitor: a preliminary report of compliance, force, kinetic energy, and afterload in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Glen Atlas; David Brealey; Sunil Dhar; Gerhard Dikta; Meryvn Singer
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Can dynamic indicators help the prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing critically ill patients?

Authors:  Stéphane Soubrier; Fabienne Saulnier; Hervé Hubert; Pierre Delour; Hélène Lenci; Thierry Onimus; Saad Nseir; Alain Durocher
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 8.  Intravascular volume therapy in adults: Guidelines from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany.

Authors:  Gernot Marx; Achim W Schindler; Christoph Mosch; Joerg Albers; Michael Bauer; Irmela Gnass; Carsten Hobohm; Uwe Janssens; Stefan Kluge; Peter Kranke; Tobias Maurer; Waltraut Merz; Edmund Neugebauer; Michael Quintel; Norbert Senninger; Hans-Joachim Trampisch; Christian Waydhas; Rene Wildenauer; Kai Zacharowski; Michaela Eikermann
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 9.  What is the impact of the fluid challenge technique on diagnosis of fluid responsiveness? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Laura Toscani; Hollmann D Aya; Dimitra Antonakaki; Davide Bastoni; Ximena Watson; Nish Arulkumaran; Andrew Rhodes; Maurizio Cecconi
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 9.097

Review 10.  Fluid responsiveness in acute circulatory failure.

Authors:  Ahmed Hasanin
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2015-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.