Literature DB >> 11881887

Randomized controlled trial to investigate influence of the fluid challenge on duration of hospital stay and perioperative morbidity in patients with hip fractures.

R Venn1, A Steele, P Richardson, J Poloniecki, M Grounds, P Newman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A prospective, randomized controlled trial comparing conventional intraoperative fluid management with two differing methods of invasive haemodynamic monitoring to optimize intraoperative fluid therapy, in patients undergoing proximal femoral fracture repair under general anaesthesia.
METHODS: Ninety patients randomized to three groups; conventional intraoperative fluid management (Gp CON, n=29), and two groups receiving additional repeated colloid fluid challenges guided by central venous pressure (Gp CVP, n=31) or oesophageal Doppler ultrasonography (Gp DOP, n=30). Primary outcome measures were time to medical fitness to discharge, hospital stay and postoperative morbidity.
RESULTS: The fluid challenge resulted in significantly greater perioperative changes in central venous pressure between Gp CVP and Gp CON (mean 5 (95% confidence interval 3-7) mm Hg) (P<0.0001). Important perioperative changes were also shown in Gp DOP with increases of 49.4 ms (19.7-79.1 ms) in the corrected flow time, 13.5 ml (7.4-19.6 ml) in stroke volume, and 0.9 (0.49-1.39) litre min(-1) in cardiac output. As a result, fewer patients in Gp CVP and Gp DOP experienced severe intraoperative hypotension (Gp CON 28% (8/29), Gp CVP 9% (3/31), Gp DOP 7% (2/30), P=0.048 (chi-squared, 2 degrees of freedom (df). No differences were seen between the three groups when major morbidity and mortality were combined, P=0.24 (chi-squared, 2 df). Postoperative recovery for survivors, as defined by time to be deemed medically fit for discharge, was significantly faster, in comparison with Gp CON, in both the Gp CVP (10 vs 14 (95% confidence interval 8-12 vs 12-17) days, P=0.008 (t-test)), and Gp DOP (8 vs 14 (95% confidence interval 6-12 vs 12-17) days, P=0.023 (t-test). There were no significant differences between groups, for survivors, with respect to acute orthopaedic hospital and total hospital stay.
CONCLUSIONS: Invasive intraoperative haemodynamic monitoring with fluid challenges during repair of femoral fracture under general anaesthetic shortens time to being medically fit for discharge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11881887     DOI: 10.1093/bja/88.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  86 in total

1.  What's in a beat?

Authors:  Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Perioperative fluid and electrolyte management in cardiac surgery: a review.

Authors:  Robert Young
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-03

Review 3.  Critical care issues in the early management of severe trauma.

Authors:  Alberto Garcia
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Morbidity and mortality after emergency surgery.

Authors:  Craig Morris; Conn Russell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-07

Review 5.  [Determinants of insensible fluid loss. Perspiration, protein shift and endothelial glycocalyx].

Authors:  M Jacob; D Chappell; K Hofmann-Kiefer; P Conzen; K Peter; M Rehm
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  What type of monitoring has been shown to improve outcomes in acutely ill patients?

Authors:  Gustavo A Ospina-Tascón; Ricardo L Cordioli; Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-01-05       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 7.  A definition of normovolaemia and consequences for cardiovascular control during orthostatic and environmental stress.

Authors:  Jasper Truijen; Morten Bundgaard-Nielsen; Johannes J van Lieshout
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 8.  [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].

Authors:  U Wittkowski; C Spies; M Sander; J Erb; A Feldheiser; C von Heymann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 9.  Optimising organ perfusion in the high-risk surgical and critical care patient: a narrative review.

Authors:  Thomas Parker; David Brealey; Alex Dyson; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Randomised controlled trial assessing the impact of a nurse delivered, flow monitored protocol for optimisation of circulatory status after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Moira McKendry; Helen McGloin; Debbie Saberi; Libby Caudwell; Anthony R Brady; Mervyn Singer
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.