Literature DB >> 11086805

Formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom.

P Carding1, E Carlson, R Epstein, L Mathieson, C Shewell.   

Abstract

This document is a position statement on the formal perceptual evaluation of voice quality in the United Kingdom (UK). It addresses a number of clinical issues pertaining to the complexity of voice quality analysis. There is also a brief description of the three formal perceptual protocols most commonly used in the UK: The Vocal Profile Analysis (VPA), GRBAS and The Buffalo III Voice Profile. Potential clinical problems with perceptual voice quality evaluation are highlighted. Problems associated with the lack of defined terminology, limitless variety of voice quality, general lack of reliability data and difficulties in determining specificity and sensitivity are discussed. A practical guide for selecting an evaluation scheme is described. The conclusion is that the GRBAS scheme should be recommended as the absolute minimum standard for practising UK voice clinicians. However, there is a clear need to develop a more satisfactory perceptual rating scheme that is clinically realistic, theoretically sound, internationally acceptable and has proven reliability.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11086805     DOI: 10.1080/14015430050175860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol        ISSN: 1401-5439            Impact factor:   1.487


  7 in total

1.  The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia.

Authors:  A L Webb; P N Carding; I J Deary; K MacKenzie; N Steen; J A Wilson
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2003-11-13       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Effects of age on the amplitude, frequency and perceived quality of voice.

Authors:  Catherine L Lortie; Mélanie Thibeault; Matthieu J Guitton; Pascale Tremblay
Journal:  Age (Dordr)       Date:  2015-11-14

3.  [Does the subjective assessment of roughness correlate with a computer-aided measurement of irregularity index?].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Iven; M Jessen; C Schwemmle
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Schwemmle; C Iven; M Jessen; T Nawka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Reliability of the Italian INFVo scale and correlations with objective measures and VHI scores.

Authors:  A Schindler; D Ginocchio; M Atac; P Maruzzi; S Madaschi; F Ottaviani; F Mozzanica
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.124

6.  An investigation of vocal tract characteristics for acoustic discrimination of pathological voices.

Authors:  Jung-Won Lee; Hong-Goo Kang; Jeung-Yoon Choi; Young-Ik Son
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Evaluation of vocal changes after vestibular rehabilitation in patients with balance disorders.

Authors:  Maria Caçador; Ana Papoila; Carlos Brás-Geraldes; Carlos Stapleton Garcia; Tânia Constantino; Mafalda Almeida; Pedro Stapleton-Garcia; João Paço
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.354

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.