Literature DB >> 15162004

Acoustic and perceptual parameters relating to connected speech are more reliable measures of hoarseness than parameters relating to sustained vowels.

Benjamin Halberstam1.   

Abstract

This report investigates the correlations between acoustic parameters and the perception of hoarseness by trained listeners. Both sustained vowels and connected speech were examined. Fourteen acoustic parameters from samples of sustained vowels and 2 from connected speech were measured. The results show that jitter, shimmer and cepstral peak prominence (CPP) are correlated with the perception of hoarseness in sustained vowels. CPP is strongly correlated with the perception of hoarseness in connected speech. Some evidence is seen that perception of hoarseness in connected speech is more valid than the perception of hoarseness in sustained vowels. It is concluded that CPP for connected speech is a more valid objective measure of hoarseness than jitter, shimmer or CPP for sustained vowels and that perception of hoarseness may be most accurate in connected speech, rather than isolated vowels. Copyright 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15162004     DOI: 10.1159/000077798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec        ISSN: 0301-1569            Impact factor:   1.538


  14 in total

1.  The psychologist as an interlocutor in autism spectrum disorder assessment: insights from a study of spontaneous prosody.

Authors:  Daniel Bone; Chi-Chun Lee; Matthew P Black; Marian E Williams; Sungbok Lee; Pat Levitt; Shrikanth Narayanan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Schwemmle; C Iven; M Jessen; T Nawka
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  Comparing Measures of Voice Quality From Sustained Phonation and Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  The Effect of Background Noise on Intelligibility of Dysphonic Speech.

Authors:  Keiko Ishikawa; Suzanne Boyce; Lisa Kelchner; Maria Golla Powell; Heidi Schieve; Alessandro de Alarcon; Sid Khosla
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  [Perceptual and automatic voice and speech analysis of chronic laryngitis and T1 vocal cord cancer].

Authors:  B Bartke; T Haderlein; M Döllinger; E Nöth; S Graf; U Eysholdt; A Ziethe
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Analysis of factors influencing voice quality and therapeutic approaches in vocal polyp patients.

Authors:  Kwang Jae Cho; Inn Chul Nam; Yeon Shin Hwang; Mi Ran Shim; Jun Ook Park; Jung Hae Cho; Young Hoon Joo; Min Sik Kim; Dong Il Sun
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Temporal Segmentation for Laryngeal High-Speed Videoendoscopy in Connected Speech.

Authors:  Maryam Naghibolhosseini; Dimitar D Deliyski; Stephanie R C Zacharias; Alessandro de Alarcon; Robert F Orlikoff
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Jarrad H Van Stan; Marilia Carvalho Sampaio; Joerg E Bohlender; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 9.  Obtaining Objective Clinical Measures During Telehealth Evaluations of Dysarthria.

Authors:  Jordanna S Sevitz; Brianna R Kiefer; Jessica E Huber; Michelle S Troche
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Acoustic Analysis of Phonation in Children With Smith-Magenis Syndrome.

Authors:  Irene Hidalgo-De la Guía; Elena Garayzábal-Heinze; Pedro Gómez-Vilda; Rafael Martínez-Olalla; Daniel Palacios-Alonso
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.