Literature DB >> 16132384

Radiation dose to the radiologist's hand during continuous CT fluoroscopy-guided interventions.

Beate M Stoeckelhuber1, Thorsten Leibecke, Edda Schulz, Uwe H Melchert, Claudia U Bergmann-Koester, Thomas Helmberger, Joerg Gellissen.   

Abstract

Computed tomography fluoroscopy (CT fluoroscopy) enables real-time image control over the entire body with high geometric accuracy and, for the most part, without significant interfering artifacts, resulting in increased target accuracy, reduced intervention times, and improved biopsy specimens [1--4]. Depending on the procedure being used, higher radiation doses than in conventional CT-supported interventions might occur. Because the radiologist is present in the CT room during the intervention, he is exposed to additional radiation, which is an important aspect. Initial experience with CT fluoroscopically guided interventions is from the work of Katada et al. in 1994 [5] and only relatively few reports on radiation aspects in CT fluoroscopy are found in the literature [1, 2, 6--11]. To date, there are no reported injuries to patients and radiologists occurring with CT fluoroscopy. The time interval since the wide use of CT fluoroscopy is too short to have data on late effects to the operator using CT fluoroscopy on a daily basis. In addition, the spectrum of CT fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures will expand and more sophisticated procedures requiring longer fluoroscopy times will be performed. Thus, effective exposure reduction is very important. The purpose of our study was to assess the radiation dose to the operator's hand by using data from phantom measurements. In addition, we investigated the effect of a lead drape on the phantom surface adjacent to the scanning plane, the use of thin radiation protective gloves, and the use of different needle holders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132384     DOI: 10.1007/s00270-005-0104-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol        ISSN: 0174-1551            Impact factor:   2.740


  20 in total

1.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective.

Authors:  Lifeng Yu; Xin Liu; Shuai Leng; James M Kofler; Juan C Ramirez-Giraldo; Mingliang Qu; Jodie Christner; Joel G Fletcher; Cynthia H McCollough
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2009-10

Review 2.  Controlling radiation exposure during interventional procedures in childhood cancer patients.

Authors:  John M Racadio
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-12-16

3.  Dose to the interventional radiologist in CTF-guided procedures.

Authors:  J G Alves; S Sarmento; J S Pereira; M F Pereira; M J Sousa; L Cunha; A Dias; A D Oliveira; J V Cardoso; L M Santos; J Lencart; M Gouvêa; J A M Santos
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-04-16       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Evaluation of surface dose and image quality using the half-scan mode in chest computed tomography-guided interventional radiology: a phantom study.

Authors:  Hiroaki Hasegawa; Jiro Sato; Ikuo Kobayashi
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-02-27

5.  CT-guided corticosteroid injection of the sacroiliac joints: quality assurance and standardized prospective evaluation of long-term effectiveness over six months.

Authors:  Christian E Althoff; Matthias Bollow; Eugen Feist; Stephan R Marticorena-Garcia; Iris Eshed; Torsten Diekhoff; Bernd Hamm; Kay Geert A Hermann
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology.

Authors:  Donald L Miller; Eliseo Vañó; Gabriel Bartal; Stephen Balter; Robert Dixon; Renato Padovani; Beth Schueler; John F Cardella; Thierry de Baère
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.740

7.  CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator.

Authors:  Ziv Neeman; Sergio A Dromi; Shawn Sarin; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.464

8.  Improvement of image quality and dose management in CT fluoroscopy by iterative 3D image reconstruction.

Authors:  Oliver S Grosser; Christian Wybranski; Dennis Kupitz; Maciej Powerski; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Holger Amthauer; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Hepatic radiofrequency under CT-fluoroscopy guidance.

Authors:  D Laganà; G Carrafiello; M Mangini; D Lumia; L Mocciardini; C Chini; G Pinotti; S Cuffari; C Fugazzola
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 3.469

10.  Clinical feasibility and usefulness of CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage in emergency patients with acute obstructive cholangitis.

Authors:  Ji Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.