Literature DB >> 16132333

Laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps not suitable for colonoscopic removal.

S H Lo1, W L Law.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic removal of large sessile polyps is sometimes technically difficult and is associated with an increased risk of complications. Moreover, the incidence of invasive carcinoma within these polyps is not negligible. Laparoscopic colorectal resection has been recommended in the treatment of these large polyps. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic colorectal resection for polyps that were not suitable for colonoscopic removal.
METHODS: Forty-five patients (28 men and 17 women) who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection with the preoperative diagnosis of colorectal polyps were analyzed. The reasons for surgical resection were large sessile polyps (n = 34), difficult position (n = 2), recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (n = 1), and the presence of intramucosal malignancy on histology after colonoscopic polypectomy (n = 8).
RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 66.7 years (range, 33-89). Previous abdominal operation had been performed in 12 patients (26.7%). Two patients underwent subtotal colectomy because of multiple polyps (14 and 19, respectively). Synchronous resection of other organs was performed in two patients (a right salpingo-oophorectomy and a right adrenalectomy). Intraoperative complications occurred in two patients, and two patients (4.5%) required conversion because of perforation of the colon during dissection and dense adhesions, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality. Complications occurred in seven patients (15.6%), and they included postoperative ileus (n = 4), anastomotic leakage (n = 1), urinary retention (n = 1), and urinary tract infection (n = 1). Reoperation was required in one patient for anastomotic leakage. The median hospital stay was 6 days. The histopathology of colorectal polyps showed tubular (n = 12), tubulovillous (n = 13), and villous adenoma (n = 12); mixed adenomatous/hyperolastic polyps (n = 2); inflammatory polyp (n = 1); and colonic lipoma (n = 1). Four patients, who had previous polypectoray with intramucosal malignancy, had no residual pathology. The median size was 3.0 cm. Invasive carcinoma was found in 16 patients (35.6%). The median number of lymph node sampling was six, and two patients had lymph node metastases.
CONCLUSIONS: Colonic polyps that were not amendable for colonoscopic removal were associated with a high incidence of malignant invasion. Laparoscopic colectomy offers safe and effective management of these polyps with the benefits of early postoperative recovery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132333     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-004-2220-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Risk and surveillance of individuals with colorectal polyps. Who Collaborating Centre for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer; M J O'Brien; J D Waye; O Kronborg; J Bond; P Frühmorgen; L H Sobin; R Burt; A Zauber; B Morson
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Endoscopic treatment of colorectal benign-appearing lesions 3 cm or larger: techniques and outcome.

Authors:  P Dell'Abate; A Iosca; A Galimberti; P Piccolo; P Soliani; E Foggi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.585

3.  Complications in colonoscopic polypectomy: lessons to learn from an experience with 1576 polyps.

Authors:  S Nivatvongs
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 0.688

4.  Endoscopic removal of large colorectal polyps: prevention of unnecessary surgery?

Authors:  J Marek Doniec; Mathias S Löhnert; Bodo Schniewind; Frank Bokelmann; Bernd Kremer; Horst Grimm
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.585

5.  The role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with colonic polyps. Guidelines for clinical application.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1988 May-Jun       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Pathologic risk factors of occult malignancy in endoscopically unresectable colonic adenomas.

Authors:  J M McDonald; R Moonka; R H Bell
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted colonoscopic polypectomy: the Texas Endosurgery Institute experience.

Authors:  M E Franklin; J A Díaz-E; D Abrego; E Parra-Dávila; J L Glass
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Antonio M Lacy; Juan C García-Valdecasas; Salvadora Delgado; Antoni Castells; Pilar Taurá; Josep M Piqué; Josep Visa
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-06-29       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Is laparoscopic resection of colorectal polyps beneficial?

Authors:  J S Joo; L Amarnath; S D Wexner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Colonoscopic polypectomy: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  Peter H Rubin; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-10

2.  Laparoscopic colorectal resection for benign polyps not suitable for endoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Lena Hauenschild; Franz Georg Bader; Tilman Laubert; Ralf Czymek; Philipp Hildebrand; Uwe Johannes Roblick; Hans-Peter Bruch; Lutz Mirow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  [Colorectal adenoma: pro conventional/laparoscopic resection].

Authors:  S Rüth; J Spatz; M Anthuber
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Oncologic colorectal resection, not advanced endoscopic polypectomy, is the best treatment for large dysplastic adenomas.

Authors:  Joon Ho Jang; Emre Balik; Daniel Kirchoff; Wouter Tromp; Anjali Kumar; Michael Grieco; Daniel L Feingold; Vesna Cekic; Linda Njoh; Richard L Whelan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  Marcela Ramirez; Steven Schierling; Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

6.  Laparoscopic resection for endoscopically unresectable colorectal polyps: analysis of 525 patients.

Authors:  Frank Benedix; Ferdinand Köckerling; Hans Lippert; Hubert Scheidbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic colectomy for apparently benign colorectal neoplasia: A word of caution.

Authors:  Marc Brozovich; Thomas E Read; Javier Salgado; Robert P Akbari; James T McCormick; Philip F Caushaj
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Minimally invasive approaches for the management of "difficult" colonic polyps.

Authors:  R Alejandro Cruz; Madhu Ragupathi; Rodrigo Pedraza; T Bartley Pickron; Anne T Le; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Diagn Ther Endosc       Date:  2011-06-28

9.  Laparoscopic resection of colonic lipomas: When and why?

Authors:  Deniz Eren Böler; Bilgi Baca; Cihan Uras
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2013-07-24

Review 10.  Is There an Indication for Surgical Resection in Colorectal Adenoma?

Authors:  Stefan Rüth; Johann Spatz; Matthias Anthuber
Journal:  Viszeralmedizin       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.