Literature DB >> 16129672

Structural basis for accommodation of nonsteroidal ligands in the androgen receptor.

Casey E Bohl1, Duane D Miller, Jiyun Chen, Charles E Bell, James T Dalton.   

Abstract

The mechanism by which the androgen receptor (AR) distinguishes between agonist and antagonist ligands is poorly understood. AR antagonists are currently used to treat prostate cancer. However, mutations commonly develop in patients that convert these compounds to agonists. Recently, our laboratory discovered selective androgen receptor modulators, which structurally resemble the nonsteroidal AR antagonists bicalutamide and hydroxyflutamide but act as agonists for the androgen receptor in a tissue-selective manner. To investigate why subtle structural changes to both the ligand and the receptor (i.e. mutations) result in drastic changes in activity, we studied structure-activity relationships for nonsteroidal AR ligands through crystallography and site-directed mutagenesis, comparing bound conformations of R-bicalutamide, hydroxyflutamide, and two previously reported nonsteroidal androgens, S-1 and R-3. These studies provide the first crystallographic evidence of the mechanism by which nonsteroidal ligands interact with the wild type AR. We have shown that changes induced to the positions of Trp-741, Thr-877, and Met-895 allow for ligand accommodation within the AR binding pocket and that a water-mediated hydrogen bond to the backbone oxygen of Leu-873 and the ketone of hydroxyflutamide is present when bound to the T877A AR variant. Additionally, we demonstrated that R-bicalutamide stimulates transcriptional activation in AR harboring the M895T point mutation. As a whole, these studies provide critical new insight for receptor-based drug design of nonsteroidal AR agonists and antagonists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16129672      PMCID: PMC2072880          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M507464200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  32 in total

1.  Structural evidence for ligand specificity in the binding domain of the human androgen receptor. Implications for pathogenic gene mutations.

Authors:  P M Matias; P Donner; R Coelho; M Thomaz; C Peixoto; S Macedo; N Otto; S Joschko; P Scholz; A Wegg; S Bäsler; M Schäfer; U Egner; M A Carrondo
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-08-25       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Cooperation of GroEL/GroES and DnaK/DnaJ heat shock proteins in preventing protein misfolding in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A Gragerov; E Nudler; N Komissarova; G A Gaitanaris; M E Gottesman; V Nikiforov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1992-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Successive action of DnaK, DnaJ and GroEL along the pathway of chaperone-mediated protein folding.

Authors:  T Langer; C Lu; H Echols; J Flanagan; M K Hayer; F U Hartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-04-23       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models.

Authors:  T A Jones; J Y Zou; S W Cowan; M Kjeldgaard
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  1991-03-01       Impact factor: 2.290

5.  Molecular basis of agonism and antagonism in the oestrogen receptor.

Authors:  A M Brzozowski; A C Pike; Z Dauter; R E Hubbard; T Bonn; O Engström; L Ohman; G L Greene; J A Gustafsson; M Carlquist
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-10-16       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Agonists, but not antagonists, alter the conformation of the hormone-binding domain of androgen receptor.

Authors:  P J Kallio; O A Jänne; J J Palvimo
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 7.  Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function.

Authors:  R J Ellis; F U Hartl
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  The androgen receptor in LNCaP cells contains a mutation in the ligand binding domain which affects steroid binding characteristics and response to antiandrogens.

Authors:  J Veldscholte; C A Berrevoets; C Ris-Stalpers; G G Kuiper; G Jenster; J Trapman; A O Brinkmann; E Mulder
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  Dehydroepiandrosterone activates mutant androgen receptors expressed in the androgen-dependent human prostate cancer xenograft CWR22 and LNCaP cells.

Authors:  J Tan; Y Sharief; K G Hamil; C W Gregory; D Y Zang; M Sar; P H Gumerlock; R W deVere White; T G Pretlow; S E Harris; E M Wilson; J L Mohler; F S French
Journal:  Mol Endocrinol       Date:  1997-04

10.  Codon 877 mutation in the androgen receptor gene in advanced prostate cancer: relation to antiandrogen withdrawal syndrome.

Authors:  H Suzuki; K Akakura; A Komiya; S Aida; S Akimoto; J Shimazaki
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  54 in total

1.  Bypassing Drug Resistance Mechanisms of Prostate Cancer with Small Molecules that Target Androgen Receptor-Chromatin Interactions.

Authors:  Kush Dalal; Meixia Che; Nanette S Que; Aishwariya Sharma; Rendong Yang; Nada Lallous; Hendrik Borgmann; Deniz Ozistanbullu; Ronnie Tse; Fuqiang Ban; Huifang Li; Kevin J Tam; Mani Roshan-Moniri; Eric LeBlanc; Martin E Gleave; Daniel T Gewirth; Scott M Dehm; Artem Cherkasov; Paul S Rennie
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Muscle-bound? A tissue-selective nonsteroidal androgen receptor modulator.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Wilson
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.736

Review 3.  Ockham's razor and selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs): are we overlooking the role of 5alpha-reductase?

Authors:  Wenqing Gao; James T Dalton
Journal:  Mol Interv       Date:  2007-02

4.  X-ray structures of progesterone receptor ligand binding domain in its agonist state reveal differing mechanisms for mixed profiles of 11β-substituted steroids.

Authors:  Scott J Lusher; Hans C A Raaijmakers; Diep Vu-Pham; Bert Kazemier; Rolien Bosch; Ross McGuire; Rita Azevedo; Hans Hamersma; Koen Dechering; Arthur Oubrie; Marcel van Duin; Jacob de Vlieg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Protective actions of sex steroid hormones in Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Christian J Pike; Jenna C Carroll; Emily R Rosario; Anna M Barron
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Effect of B-ring substitution pattern on binding mode of propionamide selective androgen receptor modulators.

Authors:  Casey E Bohl; Zengru Wu; Jiyun Chen; Michael L Mohler; Jun Yang; Dong Jin Hwang; Suni Mustafa; Duane D Miller; Charles E Bell; James T Dalton
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  A 3-(4-nitronaphthen-1-yl) amino-benzoate analog as a bifunctional AKR1C3 inhibitor and AR antagonist: Head to head comparison with other advanced AKR1C3 targeted therapeutics.

Authors:  Phumvadee Wangtrakuldee; Adegoke O Adeniji; Tianzhu Zang; Ling Duan; Buddha Khatri; Barry M Twenter; Michelle A Estrada; Tyler F Higgins; Jeffrey D Winkler; Trevor M Penning
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 4.292

8.  Effects of enobosarm on muscle wasting and physical function in patients with cancer: a double-blind, randomised controlled phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Adrian S Dobs; Ralph V Boccia; Christopher C Croot; Nashat Y Gabrail; James T Dalton; Michael L Hancock; Mary A Johnston; Mitchell S Steiner
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Rational design of novel antiandrogens for neutralizing androgen receptor function in hormone refractory prostate cancer.

Authors:  Pratap Singh; Gurulingappa Hallur; Ravi K Anchoori; Oladapo Bakare; Yukio Kageyama; Saeed R Khan; John T Isaacs
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Small molecule screening reveals a transcription-independent pro-survival function of androgen receptor in castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Natalia V Narizhneva; Natalia D Tararova; Petro Ryabokon; Inna Shyshynova; Anatoly Prokvolit; Pavel G Komarov; Andrei A Purmal; Andrei V Gudkov; Katerina V Gurova
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.