Literature DB >> 8566542

Protein folding in the cell: competing models of chaperonin function.

R J Ellis1, F U Hartl.   

Abstract

The long-standing view that polypeptide chains newly synthesized inside cells fold spontaneously to their functional conformations in an energy-independent fashion derives from the observation that many pure denatured proteins will refold spontaneously in vitro when the denaturant is removed. This view is being challenged by the alternative proposal that in vivo many chains need to be helped to fold correctly by preexisting proteins acting as molecular chaperones, some of which hydrolyse ATP. The need for molecular chaperones arises because of the high concentrations of transiently interacting protein surfaces inside cells permit the formation of incorrect nonfunctional structures. The best-studied family of molecular chaperones are called the chaperonins, the archetypal examples being the GroEL and GroES proteins of Escherichia coli. The chaperonins increase the yield of correctly refolded polypeptide chains, both by decreasing their propensity to aggregate with one another and by allowing polypeptides kinetically trapped in incorrect conformations to make fresh attempts to refold into the functional conformations. The mechanisms by which the chaperonins achieve these remarkable results are currently under debate. This review surveys competing models for chaperonin action, and emphasizes the importance when evaluating these models of considering the intracellular environment in which the chaperonins have evolved to function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8566542     DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.10.1.8566542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FASEB J        ISSN: 0892-6638            Impact factor:   5.191


  47 in total

1.  Distinguishing between sequential and nonsequentially folded proteins: implications for folding and misfolding.

Authors:  C J Tsai; J V Maizel; R Nussinov
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Chaperonin function: folding by forced unfolding.

Authors:  M Shtilerman; G H Lorimer; S W Englander
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-04-30       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Anfinsen comes out of the cage during assembly of the bacterial pilus.

Authors:  S Normark
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-05       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  GroEL binds a late folding intermediate of phage P22 coat protein.

Authors:  M D de Beus; S M Doyle; C M Teschke
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  The substrate binding domain of DnaK facilitates slow protein refolding.

Authors:  Naoki Tanaka; Shota Nakao; Hiromasa Wadai; Shoichi Ikeda; Jean Chatellier; Shigeru Kunugi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Chaperonin 60 unfolds its secrets of cellular communication.

Authors:  Maria Maguire; Anthony R M Coates; Brian Henderson
Journal:  Cell Stress Chaperones       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.667

7.  Specific interaction between GroEL and denatured protein measured by compression-free force spectroscopy.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sekiguchi; Hideo Arakawa; Hideki Taguchi; Takeshi Ito; Ryohei Kokawa; Atsushi Ikai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Protein folding.

Authors:  M A Basharov
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 5.310

9.  BAG3, a host cochaperone, facilitates varicella-zoster virus replication.

Authors:  Christos A Kyratsous; Saul J Silverstein
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  In vivo activities of GroEL minichaperones.

Authors:  J Chatellier; F Hill; P A Lund; A R Fersht
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.