Literature DB >> 16127857

How informed is online informed consent?

Connie K Varnhagen1, Matthew Gushta, Jason Daniels, Tara C Peters, Neil Parmar, Danielle Law, Rachel Hirsch, Bonnie Sadler Takach, Tom Johnson.   

Abstract

We examined participants' reading and recall of informed consent documents presented via paper or computer. Within each presentation medium, we presented the document as a continuous or paginated document to simulate common computer and paper presentation formats. Participants took slightly longer to read paginated and computer informed consent documents and recalled slightly more information from the paginated documents. We concluded that obtaining informed consent online is not substantially different than obtaining it via paper presentation. We also provide suggestions for improving informed consent--in both face-to-face and online experiments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Empirical Approach

Mesh：

Year:  2005        PMID： 16127857     DOI： 10.1207/s15327019eb1501_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ethics Behav        ISSN： 1050-8422


  20 in total

1.  Getting It "Right".

Authors:  Alinne Z Barrera; Laura B Dunn; Alexandra Nichols; Sonia Reardon; Ricardo F Muñoz
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  The Challenges of Ensuring Participant Consent in Internet-based Sex Studies: A Case Study of the Men's INTernet Sex (MINTS-I and II) Studies.

Authors:  B R Simon Rosser; Laura Gurak; Keith J Horvath; J Michael Oakes; Joseph Konstan; Gene P Danilenko
Journal:  J Comput Mediat Commun       Date:  2009-04

3.  Do undergraduate student research participants read psychological research consent forms? Examining memory effects, condition effects, and individual differences.

Authors:  Eric R Pedersen; Clayton Neighbors; Judy Tidwell; Ty Lostutter
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2011-07-14

4.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Comprehension of Biospecimen Collection: a Nationwide University of Rochester Cancer Center NCI Community Oncology Research Program Study.

Authors:  Matthew Asare; Charles E Heckler; Eva Culakova; Charles S Kamen; Amber S Kleckner; Lori M Minasian; David S Wendler; Michelle Feige; Carol J Weil; Joan Long; Sharon K Cole; Adedayo A Onitilo; Luke J Peppone; Gary R Morrow; Michelle C Janelsins
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Analysis of informed consent document utilization in a minimal-risk genetic study.

Authors:  Karl Desch; Jun Li; Scott Kim; Naomi Laventhal; Kristen Metzger; David Siemieniak; David Ginsburg
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Faculty mentors' and students' perceptions of students' research self-efficacy.

Authors:  Elise L Lev; John Kolassa; Lori L Bakken
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  How should debriefing be undertaken in web-based studies? Findings from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Jim McCambridge; Kypros Kypri; Amanda Wilson
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Snow control - an RCT protocol for a web-based self-help therapy to reduce cocaine consumption in problematic cocaine users.

Authors:  Michael Schaub; Robin Sullivan; Lars Stark
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.630

9.  Web-based risk communication and planning in an obese population: exploratory study.

Authors:  Anastasia Soureti; Peter Murray; Mark Cobain; Willem van Mechelen; Robert Hurling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 5.428

10.  Exploratory study of web-based planning and mobile text reminders in an overweight population.

Authors:  Anastasia Soureti; Peter Murray; Mark Cobain; Mai Chinapaw; Willem van Mechelen; Robert Hurling
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 5.428
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.