Literature DB >> 18332175

Efficacies of ceftobiprole medocaril and comparators in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Li-Yan Yin1, Jason H Calhoun, Jacob K Thomas, Stuart Shapiro, Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann.   

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and distribution into bone tissue of ceftobiprole in uninfected New Zealand White rabbits were determined after subcutaneous administration of the prodrug ceftobiprole medocaril. Serum exposure (maximum concentration of the drug in serum, trough concentration, area under the concentration-time curve) to ceftobiprole at 20 and 80 mg/kg was dose proportional, and there was no accumulation of ceftobiprole following repeated (every 6 h [q6h]) injections of the antibiotic. Ceftobiprole titers in the tibial matrix and marrow were 3.2 +/- 1.3 microg/g and 11.2 +/- 6.5 microg/g, respectively, in uninfected animals treated with 20 mg/kg of the antibiotic and 13.4 +/- 7.3 microg/g and 66.3 +/- 43.2 microg/g, respectively, in uninfected animals treated with 80 mg/kg of the antibiotic. No differences in ceftobiprole titers were observed between right and left tibiae for either bone matrix or marrow. The efficacies of 4 weeks of treatment with ceftobiprole (40 mg/kg administered subcutaneously [s.c.] q6h), vancomycin (30 mg/kg administered s.c. q12h), or linezolid (60 mg/kg administered orally q8h) were compared, using a rabbit model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus tibial osteomyelitis. After treatment with ceftobiprole, the bacterial titers in all infected left tibiae from evaluable rabbits were below the level of detection, whereas only 73% of infected left tibiae from vancomycin- or linezolid-treated animals had bacterial titers below the level of detection; the mean titers of ceftobiprole were 3 to 5 times higher in infected left tibiae than in uninfected right tibiae. These results indicate that ceftobiprole provided effective parenteral treatment of osteomyelitis in this rabbit model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18332175      PMCID: PMC2346653          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00638-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  26 in total

1.  Comparative evaluation of cefamandole and cephalothin in the treatment of experimental Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits.

Authors:  J T Mader; K J Wilson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Gram positive infection in trauma patients: new strategies to decrease emerging Gram-positive resistance and vancomycin toxicity.

Authors:  E Ginzburg; N Namias; M Brown; S Ball; S M Hameed; S M Cohn
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 5.283

3.  Risk factors and treatment outcomes in osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Alan D Tice; Pamela A Hoaglund; David A Shoultz
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-03-28       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 4.  The safety and efficacy of linezolid in orthopaedic practice for the treatment of infection due to antibiotic-resistant organisms.

Authors:  P J Harwood; P V Giannoudis
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Saf       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.250

5.  Concentrations of vancomycin in bone and serum of normal rabbits and those with osteomyelitis.

Authors:  K J Wilson; J T Mader
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1984-01       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  Osteomyelitis.

Authors:  Daniel P Lew; Francis A Waldvogel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Jul 24-30       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Treatment of experimental chronic osteomyelitis due to staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin and rifampin.

Authors:  C W Norden; M Shaffer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Linezolid in the treatment of osteomyelitis: results of compassionate use experience.

Authors:  C R Rayner; L M Baddour; M C Birmingham; C Norden; A K Meagher; J J Schentag
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.553

9.  Efficacy of BAL5788, a prodrug of cephalosporin BAL9141, in a mouse model of acute pneumococcal pneumonia.

Authors:  E Azoulay-Dupuis; J P Bédos; J Mohler; A Schmitt-Hoffmann; M Schleimer; S Shapiro
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Efficacy of dalbavancin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the rat granuloma pouch infection model.

Authors:  Daniela Jabés; Gianpaolo Candiani; Gabriella Romanó; Cristina Brunati; Simona Riva; Marco Cavaleri
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of ceftobiprole activity against a variety of gram-negative pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae (β-lactamase positive and β-lactamase negative), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, in a rabbit meningitis model.

Authors:  A Stucki; M Cottagnoud; F Acosta; U Egerman; J Läuffer; P Cottagnoud
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Efficacy of fosfomycin in experimental osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  W Poeppl; S Tobudic; T Lingscheid; R Plasenzotti; N Kozakowski; A Georgopoulos; H Burgmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-11-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Ceftobiprole: First reported experience in osteomyelitis.

Authors:  A Macdonald; G Dow
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  Ceftobiprole efficacy in vitro against Panton-Valentine leukocidin production and in vivo against community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in rabbits.

Authors:  Azzam Saleh-Mghir; Oana Dumitrescu; Aurélien Dinh; Yassine Boutrad; Laurent Massias; Emilie Martin; François Vandenesch; Jérôme Etienne; Gérard Lina; Anne Claude Crémieux
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Daptomycin, fosfomycin, or both for treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis in an experimental rat model.

Authors:  W Poeppl; S Tobudic; T Lingscheid; R Plasenzotti; N Kozakowski; H Lagler; A Georgopoulos; H Burgmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  A phase 3 randomized double-blind comparison of ceftobiprole medocaril versus ceftazidime plus linezolid for the treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia.

Authors:  Samir S Awad; Alejandro H Rodriguez; Yin-Ching Chuang; Zsuszanna Marjanek; Alex J Pareigis; Gilmar Reis; Thomas W L Scheeren; Alejandro S Sánchez; Xin Zhou; Mikaël Saulay; Marc Engelhardt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Comparison of Borate Bioactive Glass and Calcium Sulfate as Implants for the Local Delivery of Teicoplanin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus-Induced Osteomyelitis in a Rabbit Model.

Authors:  Wei-Tao Jia; Qiang Fu; Wen-Hai Huang; Chang-Qing Zhang; Mohamed N Rahaman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Ceftobiprole medocaril is an effective treatment against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mediastinitis in a rat model.

Authors:  Y Barnea; S Navon-Venezia; B Kuzmenko; N Artzi; Y Carmeli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Emerging agents to combat complicated and resistant infections: focus on ceftobiprole.

Authors:  César Bustos; Jose L Del Pozo
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  Vancomycin containing PLLA/β-TCP controls experimental osteomyelitis in vivo.

Authors:  Berna Kankilic; Elif Bilgic; Petek Korkusuz; Feza Korkusuz
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.