Literature DB >> 16126755

Karyotyping of human oocytes by cenM-FISH, a new 24-colour centromere-specific technique.

C Gutiérrez-Mateo1, J Benet, H Starke, M Oliver-Bonet, S Munné, T Liehr, J Navarro.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Metaphase II (MII) chromosome complements are difficult to karyotype. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficiency and limitations of centromere-specific multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridization (cenM-FISH), a new 24 colour FISH technique using centromere-specific probes, to analyse the whole chromosome complement within human oocytes.
METHODS: Oocytes were donated by 34 patients undergoing ovarian stimulation and IVF. The MII oocytes were analysed by means of cenM-FISH, while the confirmation of results was performed by FISH and/or by analysing the corresponding first polar bodies using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH).
RESULTS: A total of 30 cells, corresponding to 16 oocytes and 14 first polar bodies, were successfully karyotyped by either cenM-FISH or CGH. The incidence of aneuploidy was 25%, and eight out of nine aneuploidy events were confirmed by CGH and FISH.
CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate here for the first time that the identification of any numerical abnormality in oocytes is feasible using cenM-FISH. Despite the fact that the fixation efficiency remains low, the present results confirm the advantage of analysing the whole set of chromosomes to make an accurate estimation of the aneuploidy rate in human oocytes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16126755     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dei252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  8 in total

1.  Twenty-four chromosome FISH in human IVF embryos reveals patterns of post-zygotic chromosome segregation and nuclear organisation.

Authors:  D Ioannou; K G L Fonseka; E J Meershoek; A R Thornhill; A Abogrein; M Ellis; D K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Human oocyte chromosome analyses need a standardized presentation of the results.

Authors:  Bernd Rosenbusch
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Polar body diagnosis - a step in the right direction?

Authors:  Katrin van der Ven; Markus Montag; Hans van der Ven
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-03-14       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 4.  Preimplantation genetic screening: does it help or hinder IVF treatment and what is the role of the embryo?

Authors:  Kim Dao Ly; Ashok Agarwal; Zsolt Peter Nagy
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-07-09       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Cellular and genomic approaches for exploring structural chromosomal rearrangements.

Authors:  Qing Hu; Elizabeth G Maurais; Peter Ly
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.239

6.  Non-meiotic chromosome instability in human immature oocytes.

Authors:  Gemma Daina; Laia Ramos; Mariona Rius; Albert Obradors; Javier Del Rey; Magda Giralt; Mercedes Campillo; Esther Velilla; Aïda Pujol; Olga Martinez-Pasarell; Jordi Benet; Joaquima Navarro
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  A study of meiotic segregation in a fertile human population following ovarian stimulation with recombinant FSH-LH.

Authors:  Esther Velilla; Silvia F Fernández; Jordi Suñol; Marisa López-Teijón
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 8.  Current status of comprehensive chromosome screening for elective single-embryo transfer.

Authors:  Ming-Yih Wu; Kuang-Han Chao; Chin-Der Chen; Li-Jung Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Yu-Shih Yang
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2014-06-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.