Literature DB >> 16125974

Stimulation at the cervicomedullary junction in human subjects.

Janet L Taylor1.   

Abstract

In awake human subjects, corticospinal axons can be activated at the level of the cervicomedullary junction by electrical or magnetic stimulation. Such stimuli evoke single descending volleys which activate motoneurones and elicit responses in muscles of the upper limb. These responses (cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials, CMEPs) have a large monosynaptic component and can be used to test motoneurone excitability in a variety of tasks. CMEPs can be elicited in resting muscle and during all strengths of voluntary contraction. Examination of CMEPs during and after voluntary contractions reveals changes in motoneurone excitability but also suggests activity-dependent changes in the efficacy of the corticospinal pathway. Because they test the same subcortical pathway as transcranial magnetic stimulation, but are unaffected by altered excitability at a cortical level, CMEPs often offer the most appropriate comparison to allow interpretation of changes in motor evoked potentials. The advantages and disadvantages of stimulation at the cervicomedullary junction as a test of motoneurone excitability are reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16125974     DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol        ISSN: 1050-6411            Impact factor:   2.368


  37 in total

1.  Cadence-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability of the biceps brachii during arm cycling.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Intensity-dependent alterations in the excitability of cortical and spinal projections to the knee extensors during isometric and locomotor exercise.

Authors:  J C Weavil; S K Sidhu; T S Mangum; R S Richardson; M Amann
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Specific modulation of corticospinal and spinal excitabilities during maximal voluntary isometric, shortening and lengthening contractions in synergist muscles.

Authors:  Julien Duclay; Benjamin Pasquet; Alain Martin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Daniel Abdel-Malek; Christopher M F Bunce; Michael W R Holmes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Neurophysiological Mechanisms Underpinning Stretch-Induced Force Loss.

Authors:  Gabriel S Trajano; Kazunori Nosaka; Anthony J Blazevich
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 11.136

8.  Interhemispheric interactions between trunk muscle representations of the primary motor cortex.

Authors:  Loyda Jean-Charles; Jean-Francois Nepveu; Joan E Deffeyes; Guillaume Elgbeili; Numa Dancause; Dorothy Barthélemy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Intensity matters: effects of cadence and power output on corticospinal excitability during arm cycling are phase and muscle dependent.

Authors:  E J Lockyer; R J Benson; A P Hynes; L R Alcock; A J Spence; D C Button; K E Power
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.