Literature DB >> 28242054

Effects of methyl and inorganic mercury exposure on genome homeostasis and mitochondrial function in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Lauren H Wyatt1, Anthony L Luz2, Xiou Cao3, Laura L Maurer2, Ashley M Blawas2, Alejandro Aballay3, William K Y Pan4, Joel N Meyer5.   

Abstract

Mercury toxicity mechanisms have the potential to induce DNA damage and disrupt cellular processes, like mitochondrial function. Proper mitochondrial function is important for cellular bioenergetics and immune signaling and function. Reported impacts of mercury on the nuclear genome (nDNA) are conflicting and inconclusive, and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) impacts are relatively unknown. In this study, we assessed genotoxic (mtDNA and nDNA), metabolic, and innate immune impacts of inorganic and organic mercury exposure in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genotoxic outcomes measured included DNA damage, DNA damage repair (nucleotide excision repair, NER; base excision repair, BER), and genomic copy number following MeHg and HgCl2 exposure alone and in combination with known DNA damage-inducing agents ultraviolet C radiation (UVC) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which cause bulky DNA lesions and oxidative DNA damage, respectively. Following exposure to both MeHg and HgCl2, low-level DNA damage (∼0.25 lesions/10kb mtDNA and nDNA) was observed. Unexpectedly, a higher MeHg concentration reduced damage in both genomes compared to controls. However, this observation was likely the result of developmental delay. In co-exposure treatments, both mercury compounds increased initial DNA damage (mtDNA and nDNA) in combination with H2O2 exposure, but had no impact in combination with UVC exposure. Mercury exposure both increased and decreased DNA damage removal via BER. DNA repair after H2O2 exposure in mercury-exposed nematodes resulted in damage levels lower than measured in controls. Impacts to NER were not detected. mtDNA copy number was significantly decreased in the MeHg-UVC and MeHg-H2O2 co-exposure treatments. Mercury exposure had metabolic impacts (steady-state ATP levels) that differed between the compounds; HgCl2 exposure decreased these levels, while MeHg slightly increased levels or had no impact. Both mercury species reduced mRNA levels for immune signaling-related genes, but had mild or no effects on survival on pathogenic bacteria. Overall, mercury exposure disrupted mitochondrial endpoints in a mercury-compound dependent fashion.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Caenorhabditis elegans; Copy number; DNA damage; Innate immunity; Mercury; Mitochondria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28242054      PMCID: PMC5394729          DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  112 in total

1.  Biomonitoring of DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of subjects with dental restorative fillings.

Authors:  Angela Di Pietro; Giuseppa Visalli; Sebastiano La Maestra; Rosanna Micale; Barbara Baluce; Giovanni Matarese; Luciano Cingano; Maria Elena Scoglio
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 2.433

2.  Immunomodulation of intestinal macrophages by mercury involves oxidative damage and rise of pro-inflammatory cytokine release in the fresh water fish Channa punctatus Bloch.

Authors:  Moriom Begam; Mahuya Sengupta
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 4.581

3.  Differences in the effects of Hg(II) on DNA repair induced in Chinese hamster ovary cells by ultraviolet or X-rays.

Authors:  N T Christie; O Cantoni; M Sugiyama; F Cattabeni; M Costa
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Methylmercury induces acute oxidative stress, altering Nrf2 protein level in primary microglial cells.

Authors:  Mingwei Ni; Xin Li; Zhaobao Yin; Haiyan Jiang; Marta Sidoryk-Wegrzynowicz; Dejan Milatovic; Jiyang Cai; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2010-04-26       Impact factor: 4.849

5.  Differential immunotoxic effects of inorganic and organic mercury species in vitro.

Authors:  Renee M Gardner; Jennifer F Nyland; Ellen K Silbergeld
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 4.372

6.  Effects of physiological concentrations of heavy metals both individually and in mixtures on the viability and function of peripheral blood human leukocytes in vitro.

Authors:  M Fortier; F Omara; J Bernier; P Brousseau; M Fournier
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A       Date:  2008

7.  Comparative study of activities in reactive oxygen species production/defense system in mitochondria of rat brain and liver, and their susceptibility to methylmercury toxicity.

Authors:  N Mori; A Yasutake; K Hirayama
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 5.153

8.  Caenorhabditis elegans immune conditioning with the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus strain NCFM enhances gram-positive immune responses.

Authors:  Younghoon Kim; Eleftherios Mylonakis
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 3.441

9.  Thimerosal-Derived Ethylmercury Is a Mitochondrial Toxin in Human Astrocytes: Possible Role of Fenton Chemistry in the Oxidation and Breakage of mtDNA.

Authors:  Martyn A Sharpe; Andrew D Livingston; David S Baskin
Journal:  J Toxicol       Date:  2012-06-28

10.  Whole-animal chemical screen identifies colistin as a new immunomodulator that targets conserved pathways.

Authors:  Yun Cai; Xiou Cao; Alejandro Aballay
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 7.867

View more
  14 in total

1.  In vitro modulation of mercury-induced rat liver mitochondria dysfunction.

Authors:  Long Ma; Kai-Dong Bi; Yu-Meng Fan; Zi-Yi Jiang; Xiao-Yi Zhang; Jing-Wen Zhang; Jie Zhao; Feng-Lei Jiang; Jia-Xin Dong
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 2.  Human-induced pluripotent stems cells as a model to dissect the selective neurotoxicity of methylmercury.

Authors:  Lisa M Prince; Michael Aschner; Aaron B Bowman
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.770

3.  Zebrafish CYP1A expression in transgenic Caenorhabditis elegans protects from exposures to benzo[a]pyrene and a complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon mixture.

Authors:  Jamie B Harris; Jessica H Hartman; Anthony L Luz; Joanna Y Wilson; Audrey Dinyari; Joel N Meyer
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Clinical effects of chemical exposures on mitochondrial function.

Authors:  Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham; Marni J Falk
Journal:  Toxicology       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 5.  Caenorhabditis elegans as an emerging model system in environmental epigenetics.

Authors:  Caren Weinhouse; Lisa Truong; Joel N Meyer; Patrick Allard
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 6.  Cell Biology of the Mitochondrion.

Authors:  Alexander M van der Bliek; Margaret M Sedensky; Phil G Morgan
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Natural variation in C. elegans arsenic toxicity is explained by differences in branched chain amino acid metabolism.

Authors:  Stefan Zdraljevic; Bennett William Fox; Christine Strand; Oishika Panda; Francisco J Tenjo; Shannon C Brady; Tim A Crombie; John G Doench; Frank C Schroeder; Erik C Andersen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Predictors of mitochondrial DNA copy number and damage in a mercury-exposed rural Peruvian population near artisanal and small-scale gold mining: An exploratory study.

Authors:  Axel J Berky; Ian T Ryde; Beth Feingold; Ernesto J Ortiz; Lauren H Wyatt; Caren Weinhouse; Heileen Hsu-Kim; Joel N Meyer; William K Pan
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Sex-Specific Response of Caenorhabditis elegans to Methylmercury Toxicity.

Authors:  Joanna A Ruszkiewicz; Gabriel Teixeira de Macedo; Antonio Miranda-Vizuete; Aaron B Bowman; Julia Bornhorst; Tanja Schwerdtle; Felix A Antunes Soares; Michael Aschner
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Toxic Effects of Bisphenol A, Propyl Paraben, and Triclosan on Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  María Cecilia García-Espiñeira; Lesly Patricia Tejeda-Benítez; Jesus Olivero-Verbel
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.