Literature DB >> 16120464

An alternative experimental procedure for studying predator-related defensive responses.

E R Ribeiro-Barbosa1, N S Canteras, A F Cezário, R J Blanchard, D C Blanchard.   

Abstract

In the present study, we introduce an experimental procedure to study, in rats, a wide range of natural defensive reactions. Animals were tested in an experimental apparatus that consisted of a home cage (25 x 25 x 25 cm) connected to another chamber (25 x 25 x 25 cm-the food compartment) by a hallway (12.5 cm wide and 100 cm long, with 25-cm high walls). During 10 days before the testing procedures, each animal was isolated in the home cage, and, at the beginning of the dark phase, allowed to explore the rest of the apparatus and obtain food pellets stored in the food compartment. The testing consisted of three phases: exploring a familiar and safe environment (phase 1, on the 10th day), cat exposure (phase 2, on the 11th day), and, on the following day, exposure to the environment where the predator had been previously encountered (phase 3). These three conditions thus provided a low-defense baseline; a high level of freezing during cat exposure; and a high level of risk assessment to the hostile environment condition. An important feature of the present experimental procedure was that the behavioral responses were very stable among the animals tested within each individual phase of the testing schedule. In each phase of the testing schedule, we have also examined the Fos immunoreactivity in pontine periventricular sites related to controlling behavioral activation (i.e. the nucleus incertus) or attentional status (i.e. the locus coeruleus). Animals actively exploring a safe and familiar environment presented an increased activation of the nucleus incertus; the locus coeruleus, in turn, was particularly activated during cat exposure, and also, to lesser degree, during exposure to the hostile environment. These results give further support to the view that the animals present quite distinct behavioral states during each one of the testing situations. Taken together, the evidence suggests the present experimental procedure as particularly suitable for analyzing the neural basis of a number of specific defensive responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16120464     DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev        ISSN: 0149-7634            Impact factor:   8.989


  12 in total

1.  Central infusion of ovine CRF (oCRF) potentiates defensive behaviors in CD-1 mice in the Mouse Defense Test Battery (MDTB).

Authors:  Mu Yang; Catherine Farrokhi; Amy Vasconcellos; Robert J Blanchard; D Caroline Blanchard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Dissecting the brain's fear system reveals the hypothalamus is critical for responding in subordinate conspecific intruders.

Authors:  Simone C Motta; Marina Goto; Flavia V Gouveia; Marcus V C Baldo; Newton S Canteras; Larry W Swanson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  The many paths to fear.

Authors:  Cornelius T Gross; Newton Sabino Canteras
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 4.  Comprehensive neurocognitive endophenotyping strategies for mouse models of genetic disorders.

Authors:  Michael R Hunsaker
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 11.685

5.  Gabrb3 gene deficient mice exhibit increased risk assessment behavior, hypotonia and expansion of the plexus of locus coeruleus dendrites.

Authors:  Ezzat Hashemi; Peyman Sahbaie; M Frances Davies; J David Clark; Timothy M DeLorey
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  The anterior cingulate cortex and its role in controlling contextual fear memory to predatory threats.

Authors:  Miguel Antonio Xavier de Lima; Marcus Vinicius C Baldo; Fernando A Oliveira; Newton Sabino Canteras
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Independent hypothalamic circuits for social and predator fear.

Authors:  Bianca A Silva; Camilla Mattucci; Piotr Krzywkowski; Emanuele Murana; Anna Illarionova; Valery Grinevich; Newton S Canteras; Davide Ragozzino; Cornelius T Gross
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 8.  What ethologically based models have taught us about the neural systems underlying fear and anxiety.

Authors:  N S Canteras; S R Mota-Ortiz; S C Motta
Journal:  Braz J Med Biol Res       Date:  2012-03-29       Impact factor: 2.590

9.  Evidence of a Role for the Lateral Hypothalamic Area Juxtadorsomedial Region (LHAjd) in Defensive Behaviors Associated with Social Defeat.

Authors:  Miguel J Rangel; Marcus V C Baldo; Newton S Canteras; Joel D Hahn
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-14

10.  Short-term enrichment makes male rats more attractive, more defensive and alters hypothalamic neurons.

Authors:  Rupshi Mitra; Robert M Sapolsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.