Literature DB >> 1611960

Experience with the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery.

S Kyzer1, P H Gordon.   

Abstract

This report provides our personal experience along with a general overview of the use of the circular stapler in rectal surgery. To determine the results of our experience with the use of the circular stapler for construction of anastomoses following resection, a series of 215 anastomoses performed in 214 patients was reviewed. The patients ranged in age from 33 to 88 years. There were 116 men and 98 women. Indications for operation included malignancy, diverticular disease, villous adenoma, Crohn's disease, and rectal procidentia. The types of operation performed included removal of varying portions of the large bowel. The anastomosis was performed in a uniform manner with the EEA (United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT) and more recently the CEEA (United States Surgical Corp., Norwalk, CT). The operative mortality was 0.47 percent, with the death being unrelated to the anastomosis. Intraoperative complications encountered included bleeding, difficult extraction, instrument failure, incomplete doughnuts, deficient anastomoses, and miscellaneous problems. Early postoperative complications included one leak and a number of complications unrelated to the anastomoses. Anastomotic stenosis developed in 27 patients, but only 8 were permanent and only 3 of these were symptomatic. Two of these patients were treated with balloon dilatation. Anastomotic recurrences developed in 13.1 percent of patients. Our experience gained with the circular stapling device and that reported in the literature have shown it to be a reliable method of performing anastomoses to the rectum in a safe and expeditious manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1611960     DOI: 10.1007/bf02053764

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  6 in total

1.  When staplers misfire: endoscopic rescue of low pelvic anastomoses.

Authors:  R A Levine; O Kadro
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 2.  Anastomotic disruption after large bowel resection.

Authors:  Mohammad U Nasirkhan; Farshad Abir; Walter Longo; Robert Kozol
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  The fate of preserved sphincter in rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Ri Na Yoo; Gun Kim; Bong-Hyeon Kye; Hyeon-Min Cho; HyungJin Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Critical surgical errors by junior fellows and trainees in low rectal cancer surgery: How to overcome?(A cross-sectional study).

Authors:  Yasser Elghamrini; Mohamed Ibrahim Hassan; Karim Sabry Abdel Samee; Ahmed Aly Khalil
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-01-28

5.  Routine pathologic evaluation of circular stapler anastomotic rings is not useful after resection for colorectal cancer: retrospective study and systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  James R Holden; Pam McIntosh; Garrett G R J Johnson; Jason Park; David J Hochman; Ashley Vergis; Benson Yip; Ramzi M Helewa; Eric Hyun
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2022-09-02

6.  Intersphincteric Resection for Patients With Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Oncological and Functional Outcomes.

Authors:  In Ja Park; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2018-08-31
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.