Literature DB >> 21974760

Office and ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy in obese, hypertensive patients.

Leopoldo Raij1, Brent M Egan, Dion H Zappe, Das Purkayastha, Rita Samuel, James R Sowers.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) vs. amlodipine/HCTZ in a 16-week, double-blind, randomized, forced-titration study and ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) substudy involving centrally obese hypertensive patients 40 years and older. Patients were started on valsartan/HCTZ 160/12.5 mg or HCTZ 12.5 mg monotherapy, force-titrated at week 4 to valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg and HCTZ 25 mg, respectively. The HCTZ group initiated amlodipine 5 mg at week 8 and 10 mg at week 12. A subset of patients had 24-hour ABPM at baseline and weeks 8 and 16. At week 16 in the intent-to-treat population (n=401), valsartan/HCTZ and amlodipine/HCTZ lowered office systolic BP (-30.6 vs. -28.3 mm Hg; P=.14). In the ABPM subgroup (n=111), valsartan/HCTZ was more effective than amlodipine/HCTZ in reducing 24-hour systolic BP (-20.6 vs. -14.5 mm Hg; P=.011). In obese hypertensive patients, valsartan/HCTZ reduced office BP similar to amlodipine/HCTZ but lowered 24-hour systolic BP more.
© 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21974760      PMCID: PMC8108811          DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00499.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)        ISSN: 1524-6175            Impact factor:   3.738


  51 in total

1.  Prediction of coronary and cerebrovascular morbidity and mortality by direct continuous ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension.

Authors:  R S Khattar; J D Swales; A Banfield; C Dore; R Senior; A Lahiri
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-09-07       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Comparison of the effects on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure of valsartan and amlodipine, alone or in combination with a low-dose diuretic, in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (Val-syst Study).

Authors:  Paolo Palatini; Amedeo Mugellini; Vitaliano Spagnuolo; Massimo Santonastaso; Giovanni Battista Ambrosia; Alberto Caiazza; Ettore Malacco
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.444

3.  Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressures compared with office blood pressure in the general population: follow-up results from the Pressioni Arteriose Monitorate e Loro Associazioni (PAMELA) study.

Authors:  Roberto Sega; Rita Facchetti; Michele Bombelli; Giancarlo Cesana; Giovanni Corrao; Guido Grassi; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2005-04-04       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 4.  Spotlight on renin. The renin system, salt-sensitivity and metabolic syndrome.

Authors:  Toshiro Fujita
Journal:  J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Telmisartan plus HCTZ vs. amlodipine plus HCTZ in older patients with systolic hypertension: results from a large ambulatory blood pressure monitoring study.

Authors:  Steen Neldam; Colin Edwards
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2006 May-Jun

6.  Fasting glucose levels and incident diabetes mellitus in older nondiabetic adults randomized to receive 3 different classes of antihypertensive treatment: a report from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT).

Authors:  Joshua I Barzilay; Barry R Davis; Jeffrey A Cutler; Sara L Pressel; Paul K Whelton; Jan Basile; Karen L Margolis; Stephen T Ong; Laurie S Sadler; John Summerson
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-11-13

7.  The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with clinic and home blood pressure measures in evaluating moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.

Authors:  Thomas D Giles; Suzanne Oparil; Elizabeth O Ofili; Bertram Pitt; Das Purkayastha; Robert Hilkert; Rita Samuel; James R Sowers
Journal:  Blood Press Monit       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.444

8.  Ambulatory blood pressure is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. SAMPLE Study Group. Study on Ambulatory Monitoring of Blood Pressure and Lisinopril Evaluation.

Authors:  G Mancia; A Zanchetti; E Agabiti-Rosei; G Benemio; R De Cesaris; R Fogari; A Pessina; C Porcellati; A Rappelli; A Salvetti; B Trimarco; E Agebiti-Rosei; A Pessino
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1997-03-18       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressures.

Authors:  D Perloff; M Sokolow; R Cowan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1983-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Triple antihypertensive therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  David A Calhoun; Yves Lacourcière; Yann Tong Chiang; Robert D Glazer
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 10.190

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Hypertension in Obesity and the Impact of Weight Loss.

Authors:  Jordana B Cohen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Lercanidipine/enalapril combination in the management of obesity-related hypertension.

Authors:  Guido Grassi
Journal:  Integr Blood Press Control       Date:  2016-04-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.