Literature DB >> 16112706

Age related changes in the characteristics of the near pupil response.

Sanjeev Kasthurirangan1, Adrian Glasser.   

Abstract

Static and dynamic aspects of the near pupil response were studied in human subjects in the age range when accommodative amplitude steadily declines. Dynamic accommodative and pupillary responses to step stimuli were recorded in 66 subjects (ages: 14-45 years). Exponential fits to data provided amplitude, peak velocity and time constants. Accommodative amplitude decreased linearly with age (p < 0.05). Pupil constriction per diopter of accommodative response increased exponentially with age (p < 0.05). The amplitude of pupil constriction for a 2D stimulus decreased linearly with age (p < 0.05) and for a 5D stimulus did not change with age (p = 0.90). The latency of pupil constriction did not change with age (p = 0.65), while the mean peak velocity decreased linearly with age (p < 0.05). An increase in the amount of pupil constriction per diopter of accommodative response, but not per diopter of stimulus amplitude, suggests that the near effort per se does not increase with age. There is a slight reduction in the speed of near pupil response with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16112706     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.07.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  10 in total

1.  Pupillary light response after cataract surgery in healthy patients.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Motoaki Yoshida; Sosuke Ishiyama; Akira Hirata
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Prediction of accommodative optical response in prepresbyopic subjects using ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Viswanathan Ramasubramanian; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Suitability of open-field autorefractors as pupillometers and instrument design effects.

Authors:  Carles Otero; Mikel Aldaba; Oriol Ferrer; Andrea Gascón; Juan C Ondategui-Parra; Jaume Pujol
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Pupil responses to near visual demand during human visual development.

Authors:  Shrikant R Bharadwaj; Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Jamie Houser; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Affective Response Categories-Toward Personalized Reactions in Affect-Adaptive Tutoring Systems.

Authors:  Alina Schmitz-Hübsch; Sophie-Marie Stasch; Ron Becker; Sven Fuchs; Maria Wirzberger
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2022-05-17

7.  A multimeasure approach to investigating affective appraisal of social information in Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Daniela Plesa Skwerer; Emily Ammerman; Marie-Christine André; Lucia Ciciolla; Alex B Fine; Helen Tager-Flusberg
Journal:  J Neurodev Disord       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 4.025

8.  Clear-cornea cataract surgery: pupil size and shape changes, along with anterior chamber volume and depth changes. A Scheimpflug imaging study.

Authors:  Anastasios John Kanellopoulos; George Asimellis
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-24

9.  Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Vivek Labhishetty; Steven A Cholewiak; Austin Roorda; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Pupil Diameter Changes in High Myopes after Collamer Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Dan Li; Yabo Yang; Caipei Su; Houfa Yin; Xue Liu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.