PURPOSE: To examine the changes in the pupillary light response after phacoemulsification and to compare the difference in the response among patients in different age categories. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Four-hundred twenty-two eyes of 422 patients in 3 age categories (60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80-89 years) scheduled for phacoemulsification were consecutively enrolled. The eyes underwent examinations with an infrared pupillometer to obtain the parameters of the pupillary light response preoperatively and at 1 day and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Differences in the parameters of the pupillary response were compared among 4 time intervals and the 3 age categories. RESULTS: The mean maximum and minimum pupillary diameters significantly decreased at 1 day postoperatively and returned to the preoperative level by 1 month postoperatively (P<.0001). The mean percentage of pupillary constriction was significantly reduced at 1 and 3 months postoperatively compared with preoperatively and at 1 day postoperatively (P<.0001). The average pupillary constriction and dilation velocities were significantly lower at 1 and 3 months postoperatively than they were preoperatively and at 1 day postoperatively (P<.0001). The latency to constriction did not differ significantly among the time intervals. The percentage of pupillary constriction was significantly smaller, and the average constriction and dilation velocities were lower in association with higher age categories at all time intervals (P≤.0185). CONCLUSION: The pupillary light response was impaired several months after cataract surgery and worsened with increasing patient age, indicating that cataract surgery may compromise the pupillary constriction and dilation functions in association with age.
PURPOSE: To examine the changes in the pupillary light response after phacoemulsification and to compare the difference in the response among patients in different age categories. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHODS: Four-hundred twenty-two eyes of 422 patients in 3 age categories (60-69 years, 70-79 years, and 80-89 years) scheduled for phacoemulsification were consecutively enrolled. The eyes underwent examinations with an infrared pupillometer to obtain the parameters of the pupillary light response preoperatively and at 1 day and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Differences in the parameters of the pupillary response were compared among 4 time intervals and the 3 age categories. RESULTS: The mean maximum and minimum pupillary diameters significantly decreased at 1 day postoperatively and returned to the preoperative level by 1 month postoperatively (P<.0001). The mean percentage of pupillary constriction was significantly reduced at 1 and 3 months postoperatively compared with preoperatively and at 1 day postoperatively (P<.0001). The average pupillary constriction and dilation velocities were significantly lower at 1 and 3 months postoperatively than they were preoperatively and at 1 day postoperatively (P<.0001). The latency to constriction did not differ significantly among the time intervals. The percentage of pupillary constriction was significantly smaller, and the average constriction and dilation velocities were lower in association with higher age categories at all time intervals (P≤.0185). CONCLUSION: The pupillary light response was impaired several months after cataract surgery and worsened with increasing patient age, indicating that cataract surgery may compromise the pupillary constriction and dilation functions in association with age.
Authors: Beatrix Feigl; Andrew J Zele; Samantha M Fader; Annelisa N Howes; Catherine E Hughes; Kris A Jones; Rawlyn Jones Journal: Acta Ophthalmol Date: 2011-08-23 Impact factor: 3.761
Authors: Dolly S Chang; Karun S Arora; Michael V Boland; Wasu Supakontanasan; David S Friedman Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Randy Kardon; Susan C Anderson; Tina G Damarjian; Elizabeth M Grace; Edwin Stone; Aki Kawasaki Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Angela J Oh; Giulia Amore; William Sultan; Samuel Asanad; Jason C Park; Martina Romagnoli; Chiara La Morgia; Rustum Karanjia; Michael G Harrington; Alfredo A Sadun Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 3.240