Literature DB >> 16110774

Accuracy of stereotaxic positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Carlos Schönfeldt-Lecuona1, Axel Thielscher, Roland W Freudenmann, Martina Kron, Manfred Spitzer, Uwe Herwig.   

Abstract

In cognitive neuroscience, optically tracked frameless stereotaxic navigation has been successfully used to precisely guide transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to desired cortical areas for brain-mapping purposes. Thereby, potential sources of imprecision are the fixation of a reference frame to the head of the subject and the referencing procedure according to certain landmarks (LM). The aim of our study was to evaluate the accuracy of frameless stereotaxic coil positioning in a standard experimental setting. A parameter for accuracy is the reproducibility of LM coordinates. In order to test the stability of the referencing for stereotaxic positioning within a single TMS session (within-session stability), the coordinates of six predefined facial LM in nine subjects were recorded first after the initial registration and second after a 20 minutes TMS session. The two sets of coordinates were then compared. The reliability of the positioning coordinates between different TMS sessions (inter-session repeatability) was addressed by registering the subjects LM coordinates in two independent TMS sessions. The variance of the recorded coordinates was analyzed. Altogether, LM were registered 1728 times (192 measures per subject). Within-session stability: The mean Euclidean distance (MED) between the LM position coordinates before and after a TMS session was 1.6 mm, when pooling over all LM. Inter-session repeatability: The MED between the LM positions recorded after the reference procedures of two different sessions showed an average deviation of 2.5 mm. In conclusion, optically tracked frameless stereotaxic coil positioning is from the technical viewpoint of high stability and repeatability. It is therefore a precise method for TMS brain mapping studies or for repeated TMS treatments, with the need of topographically exact stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16110774     DOI: 10.1007/s10548-005-6033-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  19 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Reproducibility of TMS-Evoked EEG responses.

Authors:  Pantelis Lioumis; Dubravko Kicić; Petri Savolainen; Jyrki P Mäkelä; Seppo Kähkönen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Accuracy of robotic coil positioning during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-09-17       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  A novel low-cost approach for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jakob Rodseth; Edward P Washabaugh; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.406

6.  Individualized rTMS neuronavigated according to regional brain metabolism ((18)FGD PET) has better treatment effects on auditory hallucinations than standard positioning of rTMS: a double-blind, sham-controlled study.

Authors:  Monika Klirova; Jiri Horacek; Tomas Novak; Jan Cermak; Filip Spaniel; Lucie Skrdlantova; Pavel Mohr; Cyril Höschl
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 5.270

7.  Efficient and robust identification of cortical targets in concurrent TMS-fMRI experiments.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Yau; Jun Hua; Diana A Liao; John E Desmond
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Local Differences in Cortical Excitability - A Systematic Mapping Study of the TMS-Evoked N100 Component.

Authors:  Daniela Roos; Lea Biermann; Tomasz A Jarczok; Stephan Bender
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Cortical mapping with navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation in low-grade glioma surgery.

Authors:  Wellingson S Paiva; Erich T Fonoff; Marco A Marcolin; Hector N Cabrera; Manoel J Teixeira
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 2.570

10.  Corticoreticulospinal tract neurophysiology in an arm and hand muscle in healthy and stroke subjects.

Authors:  Myriam Taga; Charalambos C Charalambous; Sharmila Raju; Jing Lin; Yian Zhang; Elisa Stern; Heidi M Schambra
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 6.228

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.