Literature DB >> 16109886

Generalization of convex shapes by bees: what are shapes made of?

Miriam Lehrer1, Raymond Campan.   

Abstract

For about 70 years, bees were assumed not to possess the capacity to discriminate among convex shapes, such as a disc, a square or a triangle, based on results of early studies conducted by presenting shapes on horizontal planes. Using shapes presented on a vertical plane, we recently demonstrated that bees do discriminate among a variety of convex shapes. Several findings, summarized here, provide indirect evidence that discrimination is based on a cue located at the shapes' boundaries. In the present study, we test this hypothesis directly in two different ways. (1) Three groups of bees are each trained with a different pair of convex shapes, one positive (rewarding), the other not (negative), producing colour contrast, luminance contrast or motion contrast against the background. The trained bees are then offered a choice between pairs of stimuli whose shapes are identical to those of the training shapes, but whose contrast against the background is varied by changing the pattern, the colour or the luminance of the areas. The results show that bees discriminate between the pairs of novel shapes, i.e. they generalize the shapes among the different types of contrast, revealing that they use a particular cue extracted from the positive shape. The bees' choices between a stimulus that produces the correct contrast but has the wrong shape and one that possesses the correct shape but the wrong contrast show, in addition, that the relevant cue is not located within the area of the shape. (2) Bees trained with pairs of convex shapes are tested with the same pairs of shapes, but which lack the inner area, i.e. only the contours or fragments of the contours are presented in the tests. Bees are found to prefer the stimulus whose contours (or fragments of contours) agree with those of the positive training shape. Taken together, the results suggest that convex shapes are not represented by the form of their areas but rather by some cue located at their boundaries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16109886     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01790

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  20 in total

1.  Core knowledge and the emergence of symbols: The case of maps.

Authors:  Yi Huang; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  J Cogn Dev       Date:  2015-01

2.  The fine structure of honeybee head and body yaw movements in a homing task.

Authors:  Norbert Boeddeker; Laura Dittmar; Wolfgang Stürzl; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Static and dynamic snapshots for goal localization in insects?

Authors:  Laura Dittmar
Journal:  Commun Integr Biol       Date:  2011-01

4.  3-Dimensional Scene Perception during Active Electrolocation in a Weakly Electric Pulse Fish.

Authors:  Gerhard von der Emde; Katharina Behr; Béatrice Bouton; Jacob Engelmann; Steffen Fetz; Caroline Folde
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Photoreceptor spectral sensitivity in the bumblebee, Bombus impatiens (Hymenoptera: Apidae).

Authors:  Peter Skorupski; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Honeybees can discriminate between Monet and Picasso paintings.

Authors:  Wen Wu; Antonio M Moreno; Jason M Tangen; Judith Reinhard
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Different mechanisms underlie implicit visual statistical learning in honey bees and humans.

Authors:  Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Valerie Finke; Márton Nagy; Tūnde Szabó; Daniele d'Amaro; Adrian G Dyer; József Fiser
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Core systems of geometry in animal minds.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Spelke; Sang Ah Lee
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Blue colour preference in honeybees distracts visual attention for learning closed shapes.

Authors:  Linde Morawetz; Alexander Svoboda; Johannes Spaethe; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Multimodal signals enhance decision making in foraging bumble-bees.

Authors:  Ipek G Kulahci; Anna Dornhaus; Daniel R Papaj
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.