BACKGROUND: Women employed in domestic cleaning are at increased risk for symptoms of obstructive lung disease, but the agents responsible are unknown. AIMS: To investigate common tasks and products in occupational domestic cleaning in relation to respiratory morbidity. METHODS: Case-control study in domestic cleaning women nested within a large population based survey of women aged 30-65 years; 160 domestic cleaning women with asthma symptoms, chronic bronchitis symptoms, or both and 386 without a history of respiratory symptoms were identified. Detailed exposures were evaluated for 40 cases who reported still having symptoms at the recruitment interview, and 155 controls who reported not having symptoms. All tasks performed and products used when cleaning houses were determined in a face-to-face interview. Lung function, methacholine challenge, and serum IgE testing were performed. Personal exposure measurements of airborne chlorine and ammonia were performed in a subsample. Associations between asthma, chronic bronchitis, and cleaning exposures were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Airborne chlorine (median level 0-0.4 ppm) and ammonia (0.6-6.4 ppm) were detectable during occupational domestic cleaning activities. Cases used bleach more frequently than controls; adjusted odds ratio (OR) for intermediate exposure was 3.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 11) and for high exposure 4.9 (1.5 to 15). Other independent associations included accidental inhalation of vapours and gases from cleaning agents and washing dishes. These associations were more pronounced for cases with asthma symptoms than for those with symptoms of chronic bronchitis, but were not related to sensitisation to common allergens. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma symptoms in domestic cleaning women are associated with exposure to bleach and possibly other irritant agents. The public health impact of the use of irritant cleaning products could be widespread since the use of these products is common both in the workplace and at home.
BACKGROUND:Women employed in domestic cleaning are at increased risk for symptoms of obstructive lung disease, but the agents responsible are unknown. AIMS: To investigate common tasks and products in occupational domestic cleaning in relation to respiratory morbidity. METHODS: Case-control study in domestic cleaning women nested within a large population based survey of women aged 30-65 years; 160 domestic cleaning women with asthma symptoms, chronic bronchitis symptoms, or both and 386 without a history of respiratory symptoms were identified. Detailed exposures were evaluated for 40 cases who reported still having symptoms at the recruitment interview, and 155 controls who reported not having symptoms. All tasks performed and products used when cleaning houses were determined in a face-to-face interview. Lung function, methacholine challenge, and serum IgE testing were performed. Personal exposure measurements of airborne chlorine and ammonia were performed in a subsample. Associations between asthma, chronic bronchitis, and cleaning exposures were evaluated using multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Airborne chlorine (median level 0-0.4 ppm) and ammonia (0.6-6.4 ppm) were detectable during occupational domestic cleaning activities. Cases used bleach more frequently than controls; adjusted odds ratio (OR) for intermediate exposure was 3.3 (95% CI 0.9 to 11) and for high exposure 4.9 (1.5 to 15). Other independent associations included accidental inhalation of vapours and gases from cleaning agents and washing dishes. These associations were more pronounced for cases with asthma symptoms than for those with symptoms of chronic bronchitis, but were not related to sensitisation to common allergens. CONCLUSIONS:Asthma symptoms in domestic cleaning women are associated with exposure to bleach and possibly other irritant agents. The public health impact of the use of irritant cleaning products could be widespread since the use of these products is common both in the workplace and at home.
Authors: J Roca; F Burgos; J Sunyer; M Saez; S Chinn; J M Antó; R Rodríguez-Roisin; P H Quanjer; D Nowak; P Burney Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 1998-06 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: F Racioppi; P A Daskaleros; N Besbelli; A Borges; C Deraemaeker; S I Magalini; R Martinez Arrieta; C Pulce; M L Ruggerone; P Vlachos Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 1994-09 Impact factor: 6.023
Authors: David M Gute; Eduardo Siqueira; Julia S Goldberg; Heloisa Galvão; Mônica Chianelli; Alex Pirie Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Susan M Tarlo; Jean-Luc Malo; Frédéric de Blay; Nicole Le Moual; Paul Henneberger; Dick Heederik; Monika Raulf; Christopher Carlsten; André Cartier Journal: Ann Am Thorac Soc Date: 2017-09
Authors: Angela R Lemons; Tia L McClelland; Stephen B Martin; William G Lindsley; Brett J Green Journal: J Hosp Infect Date: 2020-04-10 Impact factor: 3.926
Authors: Lidia Casas; Jan Paul Zock; Anne Elie Carsin; Ana Fernandez-Somoano; Ana Esplugues; Loreto Santa-Marina; Adonina Tardón; Ferran Ballester; Mikel Basterrechea; Jordi Sunyer Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 3.380
Authors: Clifford P Weisel; Susan D Richardson; Benoit Nemery; Gabriella Aggazzotti; Eugenio Baraldi; Ernest R Blatchley; Benjamin C Blount; Kai-Håkon Carlsen; Peyton A Eggleston; Fritz H Frimmel; Michael Goodman; Gilbert Gordon; Sergey A Grinshpun; Dirk Heederik; Manolis Kogevinas; Judy S LaKind; Mark J Nieuwenhuijsen; Fontaine C Piper; Syed A Sattar Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 9.031