Literature DB >> 16107242

Prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer.

Jay P Ciezki1.   

Abstract

After skin cancer, prostate cancer (CaP) is the most common cancer diagnosed in men. As a result of screening with prostate-specific antigen, CaP is being caught earlier than it was in the past. This has led to an increase in cure rates across all treatment modalities. There are no firm, reproducible data that demonstrate the superiority of one modality over another. The expectations for cure should be approximately 90% for low-risk patients and approximately 80% for intermediate-risk patients, regardless of treatment modality. The toxicity of available treatment modalities discriminates among them. All modalities have acute toxicity of similar severity; however, prostate brachytherapy (PI) has the least amount of long-term toxicity when compared with external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. Therefore, a patient who is confronted with the diagnosis of CaP is counseled to choose among the modalities based on the toxicity rather than the efficacy of the treatment options available. Adopting this evidence-based algorithm has led to the increased application of PI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16107242     DOI: 10.1007/s11864-005-0042-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol        ISSN: 1534-6277


  8 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of pre-planned and or-planned prostate seed brachytherapy.

Authors:  D A Wilkinson; E J Lee; J P Ciezki; D S Mohan; C Zippe; K Angermeier; J Ulchaker; E A Klein; D Mohan
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Meta-analysis of rates of erectile function after treatment of localized prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  John W Robinson; Sabine Moritz; Tak Fung
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2002-11-15       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Effect of anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric variables on urinary retention after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Mohamed A Elshaikh; Kenneth Angermeier; James C Ulchaker; Eric A Klein; Mark A Chidel; Stephen Mahoney; D Allan Wilkinson; Chandana A Reddy; Jay P Ciezki
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Consensus statement: guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  A retrospective comparison of androgen deprivation (AD) vs. no AD among low-risk and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients treated with brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, or radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jay P Ciezki; Eric A Klein; Kenneth Angermeier; James Ulchaker; Nabil Chehade; Andrew Altman; Arul Mahadevan; Chandana A Reddy
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 6.  American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) recommendations for transperineal permanent brachytherapy of prostate cancer.

Authors:  S Nag; D Beyer; J Friedland; P Grimm; R Nath
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Impact of supplemental external beam radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy on biochemical outcome after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Gregory S Merrick; Wayne M Butler; Kent E Wallner; Robert W Galbreath; Jonathan H Lief; Zachariah Allen; Edward Adamovich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2005-01-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Improvement in relapse-free survival throughout the PSA era in patients with localized prostate cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy: year of treatment an independent predictor of outcome.

Authors:  Patrick A Kupelian; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum; Mohamed A Elshaikh; Chandana A Reddy; Eric A Klein
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-11-01       Impact factor: 7.038

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.