John W Robinson1, Sabine Moritz, Tak Fung. 1. Department of Oncology and Program in Clinical Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. johnrobi@cancerboard.ab.ca
Abstract
PURPOSE: The results of a 1997 meta-analysis of the rates of erectile function after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and radical prostatectomy have been widely used in patient and professional education materials and as a reference against which new findings are compared. With a number of recent publications, it is now possible to update this analysis and compare brachytherapy with or without EBRT with EBRT alone, standard and nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, and cryotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review and subsequent meta-analysis of the rates of erectile dysfunction associated with the treatments of localized prostate carcinoma was conducted. A simple logistic regression analysis was used to combine the data from the 54 articles that met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The predicted probability of maintaining erectile function after brachytherapy was 0.76, after brachytherapy plus EBRT 0.60, after EBRT 0.55, after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy 0.34, after standard radical prostatectomy 0.25, and after cryotherapy 0.13. When only studies reporting > or = 2 years follow-up were considered, the only significant change was a decline in the probability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. No brachytherapy studies had a follow-up of > or = 2 years. When the probabilities were adjusted for age, the spread between the RT methods and surgical approaches was greater. CONCLUSION: The differences in the probability of maintaining erectile function after different treatments of localized prostate cancer are significant.
PURPOSE: The results of a 1997 meta-analysis of the rates of erectile function after external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and radical prostatectomy have been widely used in patient and professional education materials and as a reference against which new findings are compared. With a number of recent publications, it is now possible to update this analysis and compare brachytherapy with or without EBRT with EBRT alone, standard and nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy, and cryotherapy. METHODS: A comprehensive literature review and subsequent meta-analysis of the rates of erectile dysfunction associated with the treatments of localized prostate carcinoma was conducted. A simple logistic regression analysis was used to combine the data from the 54 articles that met the selection criteria. RESULTS: The predicted probability of maintaining erectile function after brachytherapy was 0.76, after brachytherapy plus EBRT 0.60, after EBRT 0.55, after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy 0.34, after standard radical prostatectomy 0.25, and after cryotherapy 0.13. When only studies reporting > or = 2 years follow-up were considered, the only significant change was a decline in the probability for nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. No brachytherapy studies had a follow-up of > or = 2 years. When the probabilities were adjusted for age, the spread between the RT methods and surgical approaches was greater. CONCLUSION: The differences in the probability of maintaining erectile function after different treatments of localized prostate cancer are significant.
Authors: V Morillo; J L Guinot; I Tortajada; J V Ricós; L Arribas; M Maroñas; M Estornell; J Casanova Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Lanea M M Keller; Mark K Buyyounouski; Dennis Sopka; Karen Ruth; Tracy Klayton; Alan Pollack; Deborah Watkins-Bruner; Richard Greenberg; Robert Price; Eric M Horwitz Journal: Urology Date: 2012-06-29 Impact factor: 2.649