Literature DB >> 16105605

Calibration of axial length measurements with the Zeiss IOLMaster.

Thomas Olsen1, Martin Thorwest.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study the conditions for consistent axial length measurements with partial coherence interferometry (PCI) performed with the Zeiss IOLMaster.
SETTING: University Eye Clinic, Aarhus, Denmark.
METHODS: A consecutive, unselected series of 1289 cataractous eyes were measured with the optical technique of PCI according to the IOLMaster as well as with conventional (contact) A-scan ultrasound (US) for the measurement of axial length. For each PCI reading, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was recorded and used for comparison with the US measurement. All patients had routine phacoemulsification with implantation of an intraocular lens (IOL). In 284 cases, the patients were reexamined 2 to 3 months after surgery and the axial length was again measured using PCI. The readings of the IOLMaster, which had been calibrated against immersion US from the manufacturer, were recalculated to represent the true optical length and used in the analysis of the consistency of the measurements.
RESULTS: Not all readings obtainable with the IOLMaster were of good quality, and large differences with conventional US were found. The error between US and PCI decreased significantly with increasing SNR, showing a minimum error at an SNR value above 2.1. The SNR correlated significantly with the visual acuity with considerable scatter, however. Excluding readings with a poor quality (SNR <2.1), the postoperative PCI measurements showed a high correlation with the preoperative measurement (r = 0.99), showing a mean difference of 0.08 mm +/- 0.12 (SD). The difference was highly significantly different than zero (P < .001) and may be explained by a higher refractive index of the biological lens than assumed in the original calibration of the IOLMaster.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality of the axial length readings of the IOLMaster was influenced by the SNR value. However, with proper SNR evaluation and recalibration of the PCI measurements, it is possible to achieve consistent PCI readings with little variation between preoperative and postoperative measurements. These results are promising for a higher accuracy of the IOL power calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16105605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.12.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  15 in total

1.  Agreement of IOL power and axial length obtained by IOLMaster 500 vs IOLMaster 500 with Sonolink connection.

Authors:  Sabong Srivannaboon; Chareenun Chirapapaisan; Patchara Nantasri; Mathinee Chongchareon; Pratuangsri Chonpimai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-01-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Comparison axial length measurements from three biometric instruments in high myopia.

Authors:  Xiao-Gang Wang; Jing Dong; Yu-Lan Pu; Hui-Jun Liu; Qiang Wu
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Optical biometry intraocular lens power calculation using different formulas in patients with different axial lengths.

Authors:  Jia-Kang Wang; Shu-Wen Chang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Axial Length Change in Pseudophakic Eyes Measured by IOLMaster 700.

Authors:  Jiaqing Zhang; Zhenzhen Liu; Xiaozhang Qiu; Ling Jin; Lanhua Wang; Guangming Jin; Wei Wang; Xuhua Tan; Lixia Luo; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.283

5.  Overnight orthokeratology is comparable with atropine in controlling myopia.

Authors:  Hui-Ju Lin; Lei Wan; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Yi-Yu Tsai; Liuh-An Chen; Alicia Lishin Tsai; Yu-Chuen Huang
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 2.209

6.  Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula.

Authors:  Soonwon Yang; Woong-Joo Whang; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Comparison of optical biometry versus ultrasound biometry in cases with borderline signal-to-noise ratio.

Authors:  Tao Ming Thomas Chia; Minh T Nguyen; Hoon C Jung
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-10

8.  Predictive accuracy of partial coherence interferometry and swept-source optical coherence tomography for intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  Woong-Joo Whang; Young-Sik Yoo; Min-Ji Kang; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Refractive predictability of partial coherence interferometry and factors that can affect it.

Authors:  Seung Mo Kim; Joohyun Choi; Sangkyung Choi
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-09

10.  Comparative Efficacy of the New Optical Biometer on Intraocular Lens Power Calculation (AL-Scan versus IOLMaster).

Authors:  Ahnul Ha; Won Ryang Wee; Mee Kum Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.