Literature DB >> 16098943

Models of high-dimensional semantic space predict language-mediated eye movements in the visual world.

Falk Huettig1, Philip T Quinlan, Scott A McDonald, Gerry T M Altmann.   

Abstract

In the visual world paradigm, participants are more likely to fixate a visual referent that has some semantic relationship with a heard word, than they are to fixate an unrelated referent [Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language. A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 813-839]. Here, this method is used to examine the psychological validity of models of high-dimensional semantic space. The data strongly suggest that these corpus-based measures of word semantics predict fixation behavior in the visual world and provide further evidence that language-mediated eye movements to objects in the concurrent visual environment are driven by semantic similarity rather than all-or-none categorical knowledge. The data suggest that the visual world paradigm can, together with other methodologies, converge on the evidence that may help adjudicate between different theoretical accounts of the psychological semantics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098943     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.06.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  19 in total

Review 1.  On the mental representations originating during the interaction between language and vision.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Fernando Marmolejo-Ramos
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-05-06

2.  When you name the pizza you look at the coin and the bread: eye movements reveal semantic activation during word production.

Authors:  Falk Huettig; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-03

3.  How do we use language? Shared patterns in the frequency of word use across 17 world languages.

Authors:  Andreea S Calude; Mark Pagel
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  How arbitrary is language?

Authors:  Padraic Monaghan; Richard C Shillcock; Morten H Christiansen; Simon Kirby
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 5.  Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: some lessons learnt from LSA.

Authors:  Guillermo Jorge-Botana; Ricardo Olmos; José María Luzón
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2019-09-25

6.  Individual variability in the semantic processing of English compound words.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Julie A Van Dyke; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Visual attention shift to printed words during spoken word recognition in Chinese: The role of phonological information.

Authors:  Wei Shen; Qingqing Qu; Xiuhong Tong
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-05

Review 8.  Human language as a culturally transmitted replicator.

Authors:  Mark Pagel
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 53.242

9.  Looking for meaning: eye movements are sensitive to overlapping semantic features, not association.

Authors:  Eiling Yee; Eve Overton; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

10.  Activation of shape and semantic information during ambiguous homophone processing: eye tracking evidence from Hindi.

Authors:  Ramesh Kumar Mishra; Siddharth Singh
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2014-07-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.