Literature DB >> 16098883

Occiput posterior fetal head position increases the risk of anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted deliveries.

Jennifer M Wu1, Kathryn S Williams, Andrew F Hundley, AnnaMarie Connolly, Anthony G Visco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether an occiput posterior (OP) fetal head position increases the risk for anal sphincter injury when compared with an occiput anterior (OA) position in vacuum-assisted deliveries. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 393 vacuum-assisted singleton vaginal deliveries. Maternal demographics and obstetric and neonatal data were collected from an obstetric database and chart review.
RESULTS: Within the OP group, 41.7% developed a third- or fourth-degree laceration compared with 22.0% in the OA group (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.7). In a logistic regression model that controlled for BMI, race, nulliparity, length of second stage, episiotomy, birth weight, head circumference, and fetal head position, OP position was 4.0 times (95% CI 1.7-9.6) more likely to be associated with an anal sphincter injury than OA position.
CONCLUSION: Among vacuum deliveries, an OP head position confers an incrementally increased risk for anal sphincter injury over an OA position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098883     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  7 in total

1.  Vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery.

Authors:  Unzila A Ali; Errol R Norwitz
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009

2.  Risk factors for birth canal lacerations in primiparous women.

Authors:  Rafael T Mikolajczyk; Jun Zhang; James Troendle; Linda Chan
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Obstetric anal sphincter injuries: review of anatomical factors and modifiable second stage interventions.

Authors:  Dharmesh S Kapoor; Ranee Thakar; Abdul H Sultan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Severe perineal laceration during operative vaginal delivery: the impact of occiput posterior position.

Authors:  E Hirsch; R Elue; A Wagner; K Nelson; R K Silver; Y Zhou; M G Adams
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 2.521

5.  Perineal body length among different racial groups in the first stage of labor.

Authors:  Pai-Jong Stacy Tsai; Ian A Oyama; Mark Hiraoka; Steven Minaglia; Jennifer Thomas; Bliss Kaneshiro
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.091

6.  [Labour in women with scarred uterus in the Democratic Republic of the Congo: trial of scar and factors influencing the outcome].

Authors:  Félix Kitenge Wa Momat; Pierre Akilimali Zalagile; Faustin Chenge Mukalenge; Oscar Numbi Luboya; Cléophas Tshibangu Kalala; Désiré Mashinda; Gilles Grangé; Olivier Mukuku; Fanny Malonga Kaj; Chamy Cham Lubamba; Joseph Bagambe Bwama; Célestin Kayembe Mukoko; Jean Baptiste Kakoma; Justin Kizonde Kalungwe
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Duration of second stage of labor and instrumental delivery as risk factors for severe perineal lacerations: population-based study.

Authors:  Marija Simic; Sven Cnattingius; Gunnar Petersson; Anna Sandström; Olof Stephansson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.