Literature DB >> 31226709

Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Jerine A J van der Eijk1,2, Hugo de Vries3, Joergen B Kjaer4, Marc Naguib1, Bas Kemp2, Hauke Smidt3, T Bas Rodenburg1,2,5, Aart Lammers2.   

Abstract

Feather pecking (FP), a damaging behavior where laying hens peck and pull at feathers of conspecifics, is multifactorial and has been linked to numerous behavioral and physiological characteristics. The gut microbiota has been shown to influence host behavior and physiology in many species, and could therefore affect the development of damaging behaviors, such as FP. Yet, it is unknown whether FP genotypes (high FP [HFP] and low FP [LFP] lines) or FP phenotypes (i.e., individuals differing in FP, feather peckers and neutrals) differ in their gut microbiota composition. Therefore, we identified mucosa-associated microbiota composition of the ileum and cecum at 10 and 30 wk of age. At 30 wk of age, we further identified luminal microbiota composition from combined content of the ileum, ceca, and colon. FP phenotypes could not be distinguished from each other in mucosa-associated or luminal microbiota composition. However, HFP neutrals were characterized by a higher relative abundance of genera of Clostridiales, but lower relative abundance of Lactobacillus for the luminal microbiota composition compared to LFP phenotypes. Furthermore, HFP neutrals had a higher diversity and evenness for the luminal microbiota compared to LFP phenotypes. FP genotypes could not be distinguished from each other in mucosa-associated microbiota composition. Yet, FP genotypes could be distinguished from each other in luminal microbiota composition. HFP birds were characterized by a higher relative abundance of genera of Clostridiales, but lower relative abundance of Staphylococcus and Lactobacillus compared to LFP birds. Furthermore, HFP birds had a higher diversity and evenness for both cecal mucosa-associated and luminal microbiota compared to LFP birds at adult age. In conclusion, we here show that divergent selection on FP can (in)directly affect luminal microbiota composition. Whether differences in microbiota composition are causal to FP or a consequence of FP remains to be elucidated.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Poultry Science Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  composition; feather pecking; genotype; gut microbiota; phenotype

Year:  2019        PMID: 31226709      PMCID: PMC6869756          DOI: 10.3382/ps/pez336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  68 in total

1.  Adrenal reactivity in lines of domestic fowl selected on feather pecking behavior.

Authors:  Joergen B Kjaer; Daniel Guémené
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-11-08

2.  Investigation of chicken intestinal bacterial communities by 16S rRNA targeted fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  K N Olsen; M Henriksen; M Bisgaard; O L Nielsen; H Christensen
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 2.271

Review 3.  Unravelling the effects of the environment and host genotype on the gut microbiome.

Authors:  Aymé Spor; Omry Koren; Ruth Ley
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Brain monoamine levels and behaviour of young and adult chickens genetically selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  M S Kops; J B Kjaer; O Güntürkün; K G C Westphal; G A H Korte-Bouws; B Olivier; S M Korte; J E Bolhuis
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Ingestion of Lactobacillus strain regulates emotional behavior and central GABA receptor expression in a mouse via the vagus nerve.

Authors:  Javier A Bravo; Paul Forsythe; Marianne V Chew; Emily Escaravage; Hélène M Savignac; Timothy G Dinan; John Bienenstock; John F Cryan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effect of corticosterone on circulating concentrations of corticosterone, prolactin, thyroid hormones and somatomedin C and on fattening in broilers selected for high or low fat content.

Authors:  J Buyse; E Decuypere; P J Sharp; L M Huybrechts; E R Kühn; C Whitehead
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Butyrate inhibits functional differentiation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells.

Authors:  Biao Wang; Akio Morinobu; Marika Horiuchi; Jun Liu; Shunichi Kumagai
Journal:  Cell Immunol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 4.868

8.  Diversity and succession of the intestinal bacterial community of the maturing broiler chicken.

Authors:  Jiangrang Lu; Umelaalim Idris; Barry Harmon; Charles Hofacre; John J Maurer; Margie D Lee
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Roseburia intestinalis sp. nov., a novel saccharolytic, butyrate-producing bacterium from human faeces.

Authors:  Sylvia H Duncan; Georgina L Hold; Adela Barcenilla; Colin S Stewart; Harry J Flint
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Modulation of Mucosal Immune Response, Tolerance, and Proliferation in Mice Colonized by the Mucin-Degrader Akkermansia muciniphila.

Authors:  Muriel Derrien; Peter Van Baarlen; Guido Hooiveld; Elisabeth Norin; Michael Müller; Willem M de Vos
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-01       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Gut Microbiota Implications for Health and Welfare in Farm Animals: A Review.

Authors:  Siyu Chen; Shuyan Luo; Chao Yan
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 2.  Non-Antibiotics Strategies to Control Salmonella Infection in Poultry.

Authors:  José Martín Ruvalcaba-Gómez; Zuamí Villagrán; Juan José Valdez-Alarcón; Marcelino Martínez-Núñez; Lorena Jacqueline Gomez-Godínez; Edmundo Ruesga-Gutiérrez; Luis Miguel Anaya-Esparza; Ramón Ignacio Arteaga-Garibay; Angélica Villarruel-López
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  L. rhamnosus improves the immune response and tryptophan catabolism in laying hen pullets.

Authors:  Claire Mindus; Nienke van Staaveren; Dietmar Fuchs; Johanna M Gostner; Joergen B Kjaer; Wolfgang Kunze; M Firoz Mian; Anna K Shoveller; Paul Forsythe; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The gut microbiota and microbial metabolites are associated with tail biting in pigs.

Authors:  Else Verbeek; Linda Keeling; Rikard Landberg; Jan Erik Lindberg; Johan Dicksved
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Analysis of the brain transcriptome in lines of laying hens divergently selected for feather pecking.

Authors:  Clemens Falker-Gieske; Andrea Mott; Siegfried Preuß; Sören Franzenburg; Werner Bessei; Jörn Bennewitz; Jens Tetens
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-08-27       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Early-life microbiota transplantation affects behavioural responses, serotonin and immune characteristics in chicken lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; T Bas Rodenburg; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Hauke Smidt; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Cecal motility and the impact of Lactobacillus in feather pecking laying hens.

Authors:  Nienke van Staaveren; Julia Krumma; Paul Forsythe; Joergen B Kjaer; Isabelle Y Kwon; Yu-Kang Mao; Christine West; Wolfgang Kunze; Alexandra Harlander-Matauschek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Gut Microbial Composition and Predicted Functions Are Not Associated with Feather Pecking and Antagonistic Behavior in Laying Hens.

Authors:  Daniel Borda-Molina; Hanna Iffland; Markus Schmid; Regina Müller; Svenja Schad; Jana Seifert; Jens Tetens; Werner Bessei; Jörn Bennewitz; Amélia Camarinha-Silva
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-12

9.  Functional enrichment of gut microbiome by early supplementation of Bacillus based probiotic in cage free hens: a field study.

Authors:  Samiullah Khan; Kapil K Chousalkar
Journal:  Anim Microbiome       Date:  2021-07-27

10.  Allium-Based Phytobiotic for Laying Hens' Supplementation: Effects on Productivity, Egg Quality, and Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Edmundo Ruesga-Gutiérrez; José Martín Ruvalcaba-Gómez; Lorena Jacqueline Gómez-Godínez; Zuamí Villagrán; Victor M Gómez-Rodríguez; Darwin Heredia-Nava; Humberto Ramírez-Vega; Ramón Ignacio Arteaga-Garibay
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2022-01-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.